Sunday, 21 October 2007

Stalking, Harassment,Torture: Why Do We Put Up With It?

To the casual observer, targeted individuals must come off as either incompetents or complete cowards who cannot retaliate even when they are aware DEW and other attacks are but silent bullets from an assassin keen on avoiding blame, an obvious murder attempt. It must seem to them the targetting is selective, in which case those prone to respond violently are avoided. "Putting up with it" here means silently, almost stoically endure harassment and torture, often lethal in effect, meted out by non other than other civilians, without as much as a reaction meant to reduce the danger that any sentient being makes whenever they are confronted with an assault on their life. For example, harassment from a neighbor can easily be stopped by confronting that same person, exposing them for what they are or launching similar attacks on them.

Fact of the matter is there are no simple answers, and the solutions as seen by especially those on the outside do not bring closure to the issue. Confronting a perp is a real possibility, and it is an easy thing to do, but then the perp is launching covert attacks that are only known to the targeted individual, and can easily deny this. Threatening a perp doesn't help either because he is not acting of his own whims. He is under orders and is obliged to follow else lose privileges or even freedom from similar attacks.

The most natural response to an attempt on ones life is self defense, that usually means a measured response. Since TI’s do not have silent bullet capabilities, a response could mean the demise of a perp. This happens a lot in real life, obviously. Given the number of perps stalking a single individual is significant, innocents are bound to get caught up and most probably suffer injury or even die. It is indeed a fact that a lot of the high profile cases where what the media conveniently describes as a "madman went on a killing spree" involve stalking of one by many. The blame for what happened is placed on a state of mind, but in truth it can only be those who instigate such insane persecutions without regard for horrid eventualities to blame.

It is the usual case that people who take such actions take their own lives in the end. In cases where they do not, they end up captives of the very same people who started and supported the covert warfare. Thinking this issue through, one realizes that being a targeted individual is almost always a death sentence. One is either going to succumb to weapons and agents used by perps, or go postal, murdering some of the perps and others who may not have been involved, only to end up in detention, and in a prison system already infiltrated to the rafters with the same people, back to square one.

Tragic ends to stalking procedures are not the norm for a number of reasons, one of which is that those who wage covert warfare always try to destroy that part within the targeted individual that could make them react violently, albeit following a very natural reaction pattern to stimuli, to an equally violent attack.

The most important reason for the lack of reaction is that, after a number of attacks, the TI is in such a state they can hardly do a thing about attacks. The destruction of their personality has gone so far the individual has become a mess that needs sorting out before any kind of positive reaction to the issue at hand can take place.

As the term denotes, covert attacks start when the target is not aware. Usually, people only realize they are victims of covert warfare when it is too late and the damage has already been done, they are in such a state that making simple decisions is not very easy, especially following through with resolves.

Typical Perp Behavior

I have been a target of covert warfare for longer than a decade now, and I am understandably quite paranoid. This paranoia is largely induced. It is what results when one has been through the harrowing experience of organized stalking for a prolonged period. It is actually a healthy thing to have in the situation, as it keeps the targeted individual on their toes, ready for whatever.

The tricky part is being able to distinguish between the latent and induced paranoia, this being the fine line separating sanity from a lapse into insanity, but once you have been in the whale's belly for as long as I have, and survived well, it all becomes easy.

True, there are moments when nothing is happening at all and I get into a state, accusing everyone and everything of being a broken back perp. Sometimes, it is really me at fault, but then I become unintentionally extra-punitive, causing myself more harm than I need under the circumstances. This chaotic state of mind is fortunately always transient. I keep a level head for the most part, and for this I have all the defenses, the mental and physical exercises, the measures to prevent surreptitious entry or my home in a backpack to prevent contamination of vital basics just in case my security measures have been breached without me knowing.

What I have to thank the most are the desperate therefore blatant entries into my property, the wooden boards in the house above that allow me to know of the precise reactions to activities I engage in that are otherwise not detectable by human senses, for example typing on a laptop or handheld, doing push ups, working on especially the faraday cage enclosure, and let me not mention cooking and eating as this may be an activity that can be picked up by neighbors due to the food smells raised.

Most obvious of all are the DEW attacks that follow immediately afterwards and, if I am in a fixed position within the building, odors and blurry sight immediately thereafter.

One other reality I have to thank for being sure of exactly where I am is the fact I have the oddest neighbors imaginable, especially the ones I can audibly keep tabs on, the people who live directly above my flat. They are very camera shy, but then so are a lot of other people out there. The difference with normal people is this shyness does not manifest when a camera is sighted. Simply deploying one where human eyes have not spied, for example behind shades, peeping through a gap onto the street outside, is enough to make them display behaviour that indicates they have forewarning of this reality.

Apart from this, they also have this odd habit of never leaving the property empty at any moment of the day or night. I have heard of house wives who spend the entire day indoors, but what happens here is ridiculous. Rather than spend time out of the property at times that show discretion, the two tend to alternate availability so that the one almost always leaves when the other has arrived. The male does actually leave for a job I am sure is organized for him by whoever put him up to this, as cover for what he does, but he also comes back or doesn't leave the property on those days when it is clear something has gone wrong within my household with the potential to compromise the security systems. One day he stayed indoors on the very same day that the electricity went off. He entered my property, leaving all my surreptitious entry contraptions askew, not intentionally because he always does his best to conceal his incursions.

The couple has lived in the flat for close to a year, yet they have never thought it appropriate to create extra keys for the entrances. Every time one of them goes out, they have to knock on the door to be let in upon return. Talk about the ridiculous and absurd… It is usually normal for people going out to take the keys with them, especially when the trip is short, for example to pick up groceries at the shop next door, but these guys always leave the keys with whoever is already on the inside even on such trips.

Could this be a case of overly dumb people? I doubt that very much. The couple would have to be spoon faces for that to make sense, and even then they would not adhere to as strict a regime as they do, unless trained to do so. Forgetfulness and whim would make the procedure random, in which case someone would already have locked themselves outside, even inside if we are to drop to such levels of mental ineptitude.

I recently discovered that the house wife does leave the flat in my absence. Perps keep in touch using the best of communication technology and movements of targeted individuals are usually relayed to all involved so that they are in the right positions. There could however be moments when communication is not advisable, if the chance of eavesdropping exists, for example. Such moments have been, and I have actually caught the female perp going out while I was returning.

What happened immediately after sets her off as someone guilty of some devious activity. She bounded back from wherever she had been going to re-enter her property before I could even open the inner door to my flat, having crossed paths while I was opening the outer, shared entrance and, to discount any possibility she maybe forgot something essential to her reason for going out, stayed indoors all evening. She didn't leave her front door open, accidentally or because she didn't feel it was necessary what with a shop next door, so she could not possibly have feared I would go in uninvited, and the time simply hadn't been there for a quick over the counter purchase.

All of these odd behaviors are strong indicators that the people upstairs are bona fide perps, typical ones at that, and that they have something to hide within the dark, devilish recesses of their flat, that they are very careful not to leave a possibility that someone can either copy their keys then enter their property because what they have hidden upstairs is not meant to be seen by normal people. The curious part of the design of their flat is that all the entry doors open outwards, so that sudden barging in is impossible. Any attempt to catch them at what they do inside will be too slow, giving them enough warning to either destroy the evidence, by dismantling, for example, or thwart the attempt at entry.

Otherwise the single most direct indicator of their perp status are the attacks with DEW's, including the manner they react to what I am doing even when I am out of sight. The attacks with energy weapons culminate at moments that correspond to important events or activities in my life. They are intense when I have appointments that have the potential to change my life in the days leading up to for example an interview. They also attack me whenever I engage in activities that can be beneficial to my health, such as the ones mentioned before, or starting with cooking, raising the intensity of attacks to a crescendo at the moment I start eating. It is at these moments when the perps appear to completely lose it, thumping across the floors in tandem with my movements, appearing to drag a heavy object with them as they move around.

I have made it plain already that the issue of food is iffy, especially because of the real possibility I have strange food tastes and accompanying odor with the potential to cause distress in those who are not accustomed. I actually cook conventional meals in clean utensils, or merely heat pre-packed foods and, excluding the few times I forget a pot on the fire and burn the food, I get the very same response each and every time.

I once read how prisoners at Guantanamo bay are frustrated in their efforts to exercise body and mind, which is clearly the very same that is happening here. One can guess what prison authorities who go to such lengths in their effort to ensure that their detainees are kept in a bad state of health will put in the food they give them to achieve the same. Targeted individuals being kept prisoner in their own houses are lucky where this is concerned because they can buy their own food and other necessities. Otherwise the situation of any TI is similar to that of a prisoner with a very dedicated crew of prison warders there to ensure the prisoner doesn’t thrive.

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

The Book Is Out At Lulu

Visit my store front at luluto make an order. The book is available as a download and print.

Wednesday, 3 October 2007

My Watkin's House Ordeal

It started innocently enough as a mere course to polish up on the job-search skills of the unemployed, but what followed at the school revealed the incredible degree even places where those who are not doing well in society end up can be gradually swallowed up with infiltrants, those places where targets are bound to end up what with the state they are in after round the clock torture. In my particular case, what became of what is otherwise an innocent location revealed just how high profile my case is to some kind of hidden force.

I am certain a lot of other targets have been to the location because they are almost denizens at a lot of similar places, and it appears non of them was cause for the kind of changes that were seen while I was there.

As someone who already knows a lot about covert warfare, I am aware of the desperation that reigns in the camps of those who run the putrid show (desperate people never win, no?). I also know targets of covert warfare do not change a thing about their status and attacks when they move around, especially if this is from city to city within the same country, or country to country where the leaders share interests, one country is a virtual colony of another, or the countries belong to one block, for example NATO. This is why moving from one EU country to the next isn’t going to stop attacks, nor is moving from the USA to Mexico going to help.

There are a lot of known instances of targets changing country and, alas, attacks have simply continued at a lower or same intensity.

Unless carefully selected, changing jobs is also the same thing. Jobs where the target works alone or is highly mobile are hard to infiltrate, but office jobs, especially those where a large number of employees, clients or students come and go, are very easy to fill up to the brim with the vermin.

Following through with this rule, the first days calm at Watkin’s House was short-lived. Soon enough, the same thing that had happened everywhere else I had gone started happening here as well. We were supposed to be learning how to be better at looking for jobs, which includes learning a few useful skills, through the internet using a total of about 24 computers on the second floor. On my first two days on the course, there were very few students in the building, meaning there was always a seat or computer terminal free. Soon, however, this number rapidly rose and, as if at once, the whole place was filled to the brim with what outwardly were students but when you listened carefully to their conversations it became plain they were there for something else.

The length of time that the crowding lasted also started to increase. At first, people only stayed until about 11 am, this quickly went up to 12pm then 13pm, and further up to near evening hours.

There were reasons given by the staff about the overpopulation, but non of them washed completely as far as my intelligence was concerned. There is really the remote possibility that this was the case, but then students here are too eager to escape the premises, for a moment if not the entire day, leaving the chance of complete filling up almost nil. Of course, mandating people with various qualifications and backgrounds to sit in front of a computer screen the entire day is not the best way of motivating them to learn or remain within the bounds of the classroom.

The location has been open for about four years, and within that period content on the internet was completely unfiltered. Even this was to change... quickly, and drastically. Suddenly, there was a pressing need to block out a lot of websites, so much so that even those that were innocuous fell prey to the censoring. For example Google Maps, a useful tool for students going for job interviews, was blocked. A rather absurd explanation was of course given for this. It also became impossible to download or upload files, but after students complained, this browser function was restored but then only some files from some websites could be uploaded or downloaded, while a whole lot more remained beyond reach.

This is not to say there was no abuse of the upload, download or other web facilities, nor am I free from blame. But then it is rather suspicious that YouTube, for example, was blocked immediately after I had uploaded videos showing DEW attacks at my flat.

Posting gangstalking videos is not quite polishing up on job-search skills, but then it is still doing something useful, which is in line with the whole Watkin's House project where no particular profession predominates. It is perfectly possible videos form the basis of my chosen means of earning bread, in which case a website where I can display my work can be very useful. Some may argue that rules are rules, but then one has to wonder at the timing of this, especially the fact only those sites I was frequenting were getting affetced.

Downloading programs and other videos is not using the computers for their intended purpose, still one has to ask the hard question of just why the choice is made to block uploading and downloading on a course to which this activity is integral, and also just why web sites with controlled content, for example Google, YouTube or MSN, or even this website, could possibly need blocking.

Soon, after getting all manner of complaints from students, instead of a more reasoned approach, the administration changed all but the appearance of the message that is displayed whenever a website is blocked from a general notice, to this:

The page you requested has been blocked because it contains a banned word. URL =


The page you requested has been blocked because it contains a banned word. URL =

Note that this happens to be the front page of news on Google, and the post page of Blogspot. These and many more pages may not be job related, but they definitely aren't porn sites. In fact, it can be very useful for a job seeker looking for links to jobs, doing some work related research, etc. Imagine the impact this would have if extended to other websites with articles on them.

Google controls its content, and as such seldom, if ever, features on anyone's list of banned sites. It is hard to imagine a banned word appearing on the front page of Google News, and if in someone's mind there is such a thing, it is equally hard guessing what this word can be.

What is obviously going on behind the scenes is that, rather than block out websites with banned, especially adult content, the administration is blocking out content not based on a word filter as the message suggests, but on what they deem to be websites that can be of particular interest to some students. This is a perfect way of killing two birds with one stone. Rather than use a registered filter that would work very well because most are designed with such work/study places in mind, the administration go for a personalized version of their own filter whose purpose only they know, but then they base the blocking message on words rather than content, because they have their eye on something other than adult sites, a fact they wouldn't like to be apparent.

The facility is run by a private company and, according to my observations, the owners have no strange bias towards sites like Google or YouTube, as long as such use is related to looking for work or research. There is actual monitoring of the sites the students visit, and those guilty of extraneous activities are admonished, sometimes expelled. The extra pressure to control what they allow their students to be exposed to is definitely coming from outside, from the usual suspect.

The reason I am a target of covert warfare is because I tend to get listened to. What I write is taken seriously by many people, and used in ways that are uncomfortable for a lot of people. Since my laptop broke down I have had to make do with expensive internet cafes to communicate with the outside world in this regard. Watkin's House offered me the opportunity to not only freely look for work, but also use the internet for especially research and communication with a lot more people than I could before. I was able to set up this blog, for example, and do a number of useful things that I could not previously have done without this costing me a fortune.

It became apparent to me from the very beginning that there were some very powerful people who were very worried about my newfound empowerment, especially the fact I was doing exactly that which had got me sentenced. In fact, this reality was made plain the very first week that I was here.

There is a park on the approach to the building which I cross every morning,, unless the grass is soaking wet. It was my second week on the course. I am not very sure about the exact week date (Tuesday 31st of July 2007 – Wednesday 1st of August 2007 or Wednesday 1st of August 2007 – Thursday 2nd of August 2007), but on two consecutive mornings between 9am and 10am, a chopper rose and flew right above me as I made it to this park, seeming to hover there and then disappear as soon as I had crossed over. I am sure about the last time this happened. It was Friday the 3rd of August 2007 at between 1:30pm and 2:30pm when the chopper rose, and this time hovering isn't all that happened. As I neared the end of the park, I felt a weird shock go through my upper body from head to torso, somewhat resembling cold drops of water rolling down. Suddenly aware what was happening, I immediately bounded over the demarcation of the park, across the road to the only side I knew was safe, where the metal on parked cars could provide cover.

The chopper hovered around the location for a good thirty minutes after that, flying very low around the building.

I have read and heard of targets testifying to helicopters being used in covert attacks, but a lot of people refute this on account of the costs involved in flying the thing. These testimonies seem unbelievable from this perspective, but now I can hardly disagree with what these people say after that experience. Cost appears not to be an issue where this is concerned. The desperation is too high.

I believe what saved me was the fact I always wear a home made, insulated metal under my hat that goes down above the ears, and the same construction vest under my clothes whenever out and about.

I know the hover after the incident was meant to detect the effect of that bombardment than intimidate.

Within the school itself, a lot of people have come and gone who displayed typical stalker behavior, right down to opportunistic statements made to others that are too specific to my life. There have also been ungodly things done to especially employees who showed a bit too much care towards me; for example giving me more breaks than some people thought should be the case.

There are a lot of indications that microwave attacks have been launched. The heating effect they cause is the norm in that office building, even at times when the heating is turned off. I have also noticed effects on my physical being that are in line with direct exposure to harmful beams, for example sudden tissue wasting that I can only associate with visits to the location rather than from attacks within my flat or on the streets. There is also the reality my breath becomes abnormal very quickly within the building compared to any other place, indicating attacks to the torso.

On the first few weeks on the course, I could sense attacks to the lower back of the head and around my belt, causing intense heating of my bum, and pain in my head in the particular location. The attacks indicated logical, linear attacks from the rear, carried out from a room either directly below or removed in the same direction. What’s revealing about this is, just a week after this, a my bank pass got damaged. It could not be read in neither the machine outside or by the counter and had to be replaced.

I carried a gauss meter and microwave detector to the location but found no readings that would make a positive conclusion, but then again there are a lot of ways to attack, and wavelengths that can be used that these devices are not sensitive to, and a gauss meter is very restricted in how much it can tell of such attacks save suggest the presence of a machine with a very high energy field around it, which in most cases happens to be a microwave.

Monday, 1 October 2007

Exposure Alone Doesn't Explain Why Perp's Dread Camcorders

Camcorders have magical effects on perps. I know for one that they have helped me clear up entire crowds at bus stops and other locations, including offices. At home, when I placed them outside the house, filming the entrances and windows, the perps living close enough to be heard through the boards of their floor (my roof) displayed the most unusual behavior, for example not following through with the fake routine of the male going out to work in the morning at the usual time, only suddenly literary rushing out of the house at the exact same moment that the recording device is turned off or malfunctions. On one occasion I deployed the camera in the window right after I saw the male walk into the shop next door. I saw him walk out of the store then suddenly turn away, in a trance-like state, as though he was listening to commands on some hidden ear piece, then walk all the way around the block, only to re-enter the property through the back door.

These individuals are definitely very afraid of being caught on camera.

There are a few good reasons as to why perps are excessively camera shy, the most obvious being the covert nature of their operation. Recordings of odd behavior allow a target to prove the existence of such activities at the same time providing evidence they are targets of organized stalking.

The other is of course the fact perps are aware what they are doing is illegal. They can be prosecuted for activities that impinge on other people's freedoms/rights even when the link to organized stalking cannot be established. Stalking is an offence punishable by law in many countries, if it can be proven.

Though these are good enough reasons as to why perps are camera shy, they do not suffice to explain why the most go to the observed lengths to avoid the camera, sometimes clearing away from or avoiding walking through a location where it is perfectly legal to be while they are visibly doing nothing wrong. If they know they are being filmed, then the simplest thing to do is act normal. Instead, as soon as they become aware they are on camera, they almost always scamper like spotted monkeys.

Recordings I have made since I took to filming my surroundings reveal, without a shred of doubt, that most perps prefer to avert their entire face when they see a camera, or disappear from the scene completely, a stupid thing to do because it makes them easily identifiable as perps, in instances where they have the option of acting normal and getting away with it. To date, this has included situations where I have filmed people doing nothing other than legally strolling down the street, who have averted their faces in the guiltiest of manners, at the oddest of moments. These recordings must be seen to be believed because within them can be seen people oblivious to the existence of the camera(s) and, in contrast, others behaving very oddly indeed. Some people act as though they already know the device is there but have no choice but to walk that way.

My theory about the criteria by which perps are selected, especially their aberrant therefore blackmail prone background offers a viable explanation of this. Some of these perps could very well be people who are doing their part because they have been offered a bargain, not by some criminal syndicate, but the law itself. They could be their paid killers by profession, the kind who give themselves in after they have commited a crime because they know they can walk out the back door after a few months, when the legal process is done, the bereaved and prosecuting parties have moved on in life and there is no need to check on them. Society after all believes they are safely doing their time behind bars, not knowing how violated the social contract upon which the prison system is founded has become.

They could be other types of known offenders too. They could even be foreign nationals wanted in their lands of origin for crimes against humanity who have exchanged refuge from the law in their countries for covert elimination activities in another.

Living where nobody can recognize them, the last thing they want is a recording of their likeness on a target's camera that could be passed on to the internet or other medium, displayed then maybe recognized by the wrong person.

It would follow logically from this that not only would the perp get in trouble, but the entire existence of a system so infiltrated it can let such characters free, even offer them a service or job that is in itself an affront to civil society, would be exposed.

This means the avoidance of cameras is mandated. It must be an integral part of the perp's training.

This knowledge should also free a lot of people constantly getting mobbed, or gangstalked out of their lives. There's more fresh air to be had when armed with preferably a camcorder than a mere camera. My advise is that you do not make it obvious you are filming the first time around, that you introduce it to those areas that you have become aware are infested with the vermin. Whip it out one day and those who will not appear thereafter will in most probability be perps who cannot afford to have their faces recognized. There will be a group who can afford exposure and, to deal with them, keep the lid off the lens as you sit at your work or stroll down the street. You will suddenly discover that the cruel and abrasive comments and behavior that followed you wherever you went is suddenly a thing of the past as everyone around you tries their level best to behave like civilized beings.

It's at such times that one should wonder what recourse there would be for targets if descent governments took over, and their snitches, who would be drawn from the conscientious crowd, would not be afraid of being seen or have what they say heard by people other than their stalking group and the target. At least then it will be painfully clear who the sinner is.