Sheikh Anta Diop provided ample proof that the founders and rulers of the mighty Egyptian civilization were not extra-terrestrials or races that came in from the east or north. They were of the same stock as today's supernumerary sub-Saharan Africans. This evidence, backed by science ... would not have been music to the ears of the Greeks, their successors the Romans, who in turn were succeeded by the current, dominant culture that clearly also insists on continuing the movement to obliterate all connections blacks have to Ancient Egypt.
If the proof Sheikh Anta Diop gave is accepted, then it would also have to be accepted that there has been a wholesale self-serving tampering of history that starts with the Greeks and is maintained by successors. It means the whole line of these succeeding actors are masqueradors. The last thing they would want is for this knowledge to be put in the public domain.
Consider the fate of the late African American George GM James. He was a Freemason. He authored the book "Stolen Legacy", a more direct statement regarding the same issue that motivated Sheikh Anta Diop to carry out the melanin tests. The message imparted in James' book has pretty much the same effect on the system as Sheikh Anta Diop's evidence. There is much speculation about Sheikh Anta Diop's untimely death, but not about James'. He was murdered shortly after his book was published. His murder was done in such a way there was no mistaking who had done it, no getting the details of what had transpired wrong. The Freemasons had murdered him for breaking the Blue Lodge Oath (1st to 3rd degree) that states: "I promise I will not write, print, cut or engrave masonic secrets ... binding myself under no less penalty than to have my throat cut across, my tongue torn out by the roots and my body burned." Because James' book deals with the same subject matter as Sheikh Anta Diop's material, and George GM James was murdered for the facts he put into his book, his murder done in such a way there could be no doubt who had done it and why, we can be sure Sheikh Anta Diop, who indirectly did what another African had done and been murdered for, would also not have been allowed to live, whether he was a Freemason or not. If he had become a member of this secret society, he would in most probability have been dissuaded from a pursuit that could culminate in the revelation of truths that resemble or would have the same effect on the culture as those revealed to him by the society he had joined, truths that he had sworn not to reveal ... the secrets the Freemasons keep, and are prepared to kill to keep.
One should wonder at this Masonic oath and the secrets being referenced. Why should knowledge such as that revealed in Diop and James' books be kept away from the general public unless this culture is a masquerade? What relationship does the leading culture have with Africans given it withholds their history from them, as such denies them their full identity, even going to the extent of murdering those who happen upon snippets of it and then, by way of the book, the principle medium of disseminating information, share it? What place is reserved for Africans within this culture if giving them knowledge that makes them aware of who they are, that is their right to know, is not allowed and punishable by death?
The disturbing thing about this is the fact this knowledge can be arrived at many other ways - not just by exposure to Freemasonic secrets . The best example we have of an individual who arrived at such knowledge through means other than exposure to secret society secrets is Sheikh Anta Diop. If there is a society that actually makes joining members swear an oath, that kills these members once they break the oath, then we are better off realizing they will kill anybody, not just those who are barred by oath, because, logically, the affiliation of the source of the knowledge becomes irrelevant once it is out there for all to see. I use the term "logically" because what the Freemasons fear is the fallout after the knowledge is in the public domain. The extent of their fear is in the inclusion of an oath with a draconian penalty if broken. If we see the sense in this, then we will in turn look with raised eyebrows at the Freemasons and realize what it really is they are here to do. We will understand why they choose for membership the type of individuals that they do. This is to say we will understand the criteria they use to seek members. It should make us look at the Blue Lodge Oath as having no other use than to silence a few, whom we should logically regard as individuals who met the criteria for this secret society's membership, because they ... were seen to have what it takes to see through the lies.
As already shown, it does not matter where the revelation comes from. The point is to keep that given truth away from the public domain. The Freemasons are not going to be murderous about secrets that are in fact not secrets because they are in the public domain. What is the point of this?
We know we are thinking correctly when we draw such conclusions, we know we are not having delusions or making preconceptions ... not only because it makes sense, but also because secret societies are so sure that, over time, they have moved their chess pieces so expertly nobody can know what they are about. As such, they have left abundant evidence of what they are really about everywhere, sure non of the bits and pieces will aid anyone in joining the dots. In fact, the information will mislead rather than guide. Insignia the Freemasons and other powers-that-be players openly and abundantly use happens to be ancient Greek in origin. A good example of such insignia is the Grecian sphinx covering an urn (vase) with its right paw that the Freemasons use. The best definition of the word Sphinx is provided by Webster's dictionary which is "to guard, protect, gatekeeper". When we combine this insignia with what we have learnt beforehand, the oaths, murders, selection criteria that seeks to root out seers, we realize the duty of the Freemasons is to guard ... truths. They are keepers of secrets that the general public should not be privy to. Thus they are awake while the rest of us wallow in a false reality.
The Freemasons are performing this role for this culture because it is masquerading, ie. pretending to be what it is not in order to deceive people or other cultures.
A masquerading culture would lose its way and fail, catastrophically, if it did not have a structure with a function such as that provided by the Freemasons in place. The insignia used by this secret society is all Grecian, meaning it is a trace, a trail that once followed will lead us to the truth about the society and system as a whole. We have to trace our way back to the height of the Greek culture in order to find the mother of all truths regarding the Freemason phenomenon and this culture. We do not have to search far because this truth is revealed by way of an incongruity that transpires after Greece colonizes Egypt.
It is a fact that a conqueror uses the conquest he has managed to achieve as proof of his superiority over the conquered. Because a significant number of those in the ranks of the conquered find this easy to believe, it makes the process of subjugation, of enforcing his culture on the conquered - religion, ways, names, etc., as a way of cementing the subjugation process - easier. The spoils of war can be reaped, taken, enjoyed with minimal expense, and all because a critical number of the conquered regard the conqueror as superior and as a result feel obliged to obey.
We know from the aftermath of Egypt's conquest and subjugation by Greece that the Greeks were after the Egyptian culture over other material spoils. We can surmise from this that, after centuries of waging wars for spoils and always having to go back to the drawing board broke, the Greeks had figured mighty Egypt's secret of permanent wealth and glory out. They already knew what the sorcerer's magic wand made: wealth ... and now they knew what the magic word was: cultural supremacy. They realized they could also get there if they worked hard at it, but there was no telling how long this would take. They already had a serious competitor where this was concerned, and prospects of them overtaking this culture were there, but slim. The Greeks were impatient. They wanted it all there and then. There was only one way to do this: theft.
To explain, Egypt's advancement, which made it a center to which much of the world flocked, was a product of its advanced level of cultural development. When a culture has visible signs of high advancement, everything good is bound to end up there. The best minds beat a path to that culture, ensuring it stays ahead of all others. The creme de la creme of human genes are bound to end up there once they have heard of this culture, and contribute as only they are capable. When Greece began to understand this, it wanted it all. The Greeks evidently figured they could have the glory if they took the magic wand by force, and this they did when they were able. But then the realization was soon made that taking an advantage that another had gained naturally by force entails using force to retain it. The Greeks had to use lies, murder, brainwashing, falsification of history, etc. to keep the advantage, in the hope, with time, it would all become unnecesary. They saw a time in future when, thanks to brute efforts, the stolen culture would become theirs in full. All they would have to do from henceforth is defend it from others who would have wanted to get it the same way they had, and still others who would have challenged their dubiously acquired status among cultures by natural growth.
As soon as they had taken the culture, truth became an enemy ... as it should when one has to masquerade to make the sorcerer's magic wand work. Believing one's own lies and the risk of blundering massively as a result of much self deception increased with the day. Greeks must have seen early on that they had to part society. It became necessary to have the rulers and their secret societies aware of the truth, and the ruled who had to be kept outside this bracket and made to live a reality created for them by the rulers. The ruled would act out the masquerade. Being a misled lot, they would be as lost as sheep and constantly in need of shepherding.
This arrangement worked. Greece did get cultural or racial supremacy in the end, because it persisted with brute methods. They virtually destroyed all that which could reveal to their people and to melanated people as well the horrible things they had done and had to keep doing to keep the good fortune coming their way. For example, they did not let wide nosed people know what they had done and continued to do to them to force the fact they were inferior by not allowing them to get the smallest of clues they had in fact made and worn the crown the Greeks had now put on their heads. This is seen in, for instance, the breaking off of broad noses on statues from a past the Greeks realized had to be preserved but be painted Greek in color. Freemason like groups, created when it was realized they were necessary, kept up with the task of chipping away at noses, for example doing all they could to ensure when an instance of an "African Computer" was found, they convinced the masses the case was an aberration. They became masters at singing lullabies that sent the masses back to sleep. They also became masters at spotting personality profiles that could get to truths that were better kept secret by rationalization, and thought out ways of keeping them silent.
No comments:
Post a Comment