Saturday, 21 July 2018

How to Defeat Social Media Censorship and Manipulation

Social media icons

There are many reasons people log onto social media, also known as social networking sites. They log on to connect with family and friends, to be abreast of the latest developments regarding, to share the latest that's happening to them and see the same that their friends and family post. Others use social networking sites as a platform for activism, while the motivation for some may be to connect with an online community made up of people whose experiences, interests, convictions or causes are akin to theirs, and so on.

Social networking sites such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc., are all, without exception, businesses. This means they make money off of the social networking services they provide. They are also, admittedly, used to manipulate public opinion by management of the social networking experience of those who use them. This manipulation stands apart from the business end of the networking site, and would be at loggerheads with it if not for the care taken to ensure it is done as covertly as is possible. employing in this all the means that ensure those who get the brunt of such surreptitious actions are isolated from others who are not being affected to the point they know their experience is under manipulation.

These actions are not designed to enhance the lucrative potential of the business but to prevent the social networking activities of individual users from either becoming threats to the order or veering off a desired path, and where the establishmentarian shares in the profits made in the venture, which is the case in almost all dominant social networking sites, the activities can be considered done in self interest.

As businesses, social networking sites do the very same things businesses do to maximise profits, and sometimes these activities can be illegal and under handed while being deleterious to users.

The recent Facebook user data abuse scandal is a case in point.

Mark Zuckerberg testifying over the Facebook user abuse scandal in the US Congress

As public opinion control centres, networking sites operate in much the same way mainstream media is known to operate vis-a-vis public opinion. They guide people around the maze of the site to views that provide for the creation of brainwashed slaves, also referred to as sheeple.

It cannot be doubted or disputed that social networking sites have the power to rally the masses behind causes when left to their own devices, or in autopilot, in territories where the powers-that-be have no leverage within the site. They are in fact verified to have been used as the central organising points crucial to the outcome of many of the so called velvet revolutions that hit the middle east about a decade ago.

It is thus no surprise that governments worldwide are wary of social networking activities for their capacity to galvanise the masses around a movement or cause, or against an order, because they understand this could cost them their hold on power if left unchecked, or lead to instances of successfully coordinated public unrest.

The manipulative control social networking users are subject to by governments with leverage on and in them are therefore done with an eye on preventing social networking activity from becoming a threat to social order, and it should come as no surprise that governments without leverage in and on specific social networking giants are wary of their widespread use on their territory. Facebook, for example, is banned in some countries, including China, North Korea, and Iran where the bans are round the clock. In many other parts of the world it is just heavily restricted.

Alternative and dominant search engine "Baidu" in China

This banning or restriction of social networking giants in some countries can only come as a surprise to those who do not know the history of the most successful of these sites, including in this knowledge of who in fact controls specific sites.

It may just be my suspicion that Facebook, for instance, was not started by Mark Zuckerberg, as the official account goes, but by western secret service agencies at the behest of the Freemasons whose insignia the company fully bears. This real possibility has been expressed by more people I know, basing it on facts that may not be admissible in a court of law, a fact that can be used to further the conviction given people who conspire to deceive leave little room for evidence that is admissible in a court of law. The suspicion is further supported by bans Facebook has in countries that have developed their own alternative social networking giants, countries that have kept their eyes open, evidently.

The story of facebook's dubious rise to prominence is another factor that points to not so humble beginnings as the official version points out. A fact in point is this, that In the mid nineties, the persistence of Facebook to force itself onto computer systems earned it a placing on the list of active bugs on virus scanning and cleaning software. The facebook bug had the capacity to hijack a computer's desktop and change wallpaper settings and was hard to remove until a link was clicked that led to the Facebook registration page on the worldwide net.

This not so humble beginning of this networking giant at a time when social networking mega sites were already active and abundant, that were all forced out of the way using very dirty tactics that sometimes included founder suicides and flights, could not reasonably have been the work of two guys in some attic in America, but a body or social organ with control over more resources than could be accessible to average everyday Jim and Jack.

My plain English take on this ... but I stray.

As things stand today, facebook and a few other networking sites won out in this cyber war and it has become a fact that the capacity of social networking sites to reach a wide strata of the public is being abused to the detriment of the very people taking advantage of what these sites offer, and the manners that this is being done are manifold.

There are negative consequences from such abuse, starting with deliberately induced addiction, going on to much more sinister things that can be classed within the category of mind control. These operations are known about and have seen lengthy treatment and analysis by experts, so called conspiracy theorists and, not to be outdone, the leading media has also delved into this issue.

Anthony J. Christoff, MD, writer of the article The Mind Control Tactics Used Within Facebook, looking at some of the underhanded tactics Facebook and other social networking sites employ to ensure people are kept coming back.

My own experience of social networking platforms pre-dates facebook, but in the era of Facebook includes manipulations I have experienced for over a decade that are not designed to make me an addict, but to achieve the very reverse, and though I should be happy that I am as such not at risk of addiction, there is no comfort to be drawn from the fact the mind control is still an issue even when this is done to make me averse to logging onto the site and also the fact there have been consistent and persistent attempts to frustrate my activism on these sites, which is the major reason I joined Facebook and the rest of them.

The list of things that continue to happen to my Facebook experience amount to the deliberate creation of a world in which I am isolated from my target audience and find myself co-existing with total strangers and I can share the following hallmarks of the operation:

1. exclusion or distancing from the familiar:

a) . too few to no posts in my news feed by people who are related to me, loved ones, friends I am close to online or off-line and others I constantly communicate with on the same sites. This happens continuously even when these people are as busy if not busier than I am ... and the same is true in reverse.
b) People who are the most helpful in my activism, those who contribute a lot to my posts, are also gradually excluded from my news feed so that it comes to consist entirely of uninteresting posts by friends I can only refer to as acquaintances.

2. lack of notification of relevant activity

a) I am notified of posts people who are not in my friend list make to groups I belong to and not posts by friends to the same groups, which would not be the case if I was given moderator privileges within the group without my knowledge.
b) Reactions made to my posts are not always announced. I have to manually sift through older status updates to see whether comments and reactions have been made to previous status updates or posts to groups.

3. I am excluded from the wider Facebook network that I opted to be a part of. I no longer get updates from pages I liked and there were at some point a total of about 200 that have seen gradual deletion by a third party to the point now there are but a handful, forcing me to constantly like new pages as old ones are removed by a third party

4. There has of late been actual deliberate "in code" removal of an option that facebook provides all users to enhance the experience.
a) I recently noticed that the "on this day" feed that looks back in time to status updates I made on the same day in years gone by had been removed from the menu. At first I thought it had gone the same way the "explore feed" had gone but discovered when I logged into a professional and less busy profile I maintain on Facebook that it had not been removed from that account. I asked other users and verified that the feed was still available on their profiles. It went missing on my account for a good two weeks and only returned after I made the discovery it had not in fact been removed on other accounts. This was odd, but not unusual, and I can only conclude that my reliance on this feed had made it a pain to those who want my posts to be restricted in a certain way.
b) A fake version of my profile is spoofed to some people so they see updates I have not made. In one case the user in question was one that knew me well and, because they live far from me, could not verify my actual address. A post appeared with a GPS tag with a location set for England and they know that I am in Africa right now. The point of this was to sow the seeds of distrust, obviously.
c) My account was cloned several times and friends of mine were engaged in conversations by the cloners.
d) I have locked my profile from posts by others yet a scandalous image I had not posted was forced onto my profile with privacy settings set to "public". It was a picture of a naked man with nothing but a penis ring on his manhood, splashed across my profile while I slumbered. Facebook admin somehow found this picture and knew it got there through a hack. They deleted the image before I awoke to find a report asking me to review the post and change my password if necessary.

Images showing facebook's privacy settings page where you can set your privacy setting preferences.

And there is more, some of which you can read in a linked article at the bottom of this piece.

The list of things going wrong with the busiest profile I maintain on Facebook goes on and on and if you think it is an algorithm or settings I am failing to make causing this then think again. The list of things I mention above could not possibly be common experiences caused by an algorithm or settings I have made or not made.

As already mentioned, Facebook is a business ... and the algorithm or lines of code that manages user experience on the platform is designed to make the experience as addictive as can be. The algorithm is designed to lure people onto facebook, to encourage them to come back, to make logging on irresistible.

What is happening with my account is far from as well as the reverse of this. The posts I am being led to are not drawing the most reads and reactions. I am not abreast of developments in the lives of people close to me and also not being drawn to the rest that is relevant to my life no matter how much I manually direct my attention to these posts.

This procedure is being applied to a lot of people on facebook and other social networking sites, and there is no other way to explain how it is being done than that it is all manual. It is being done by groups of people, thousands of them to boot, at secret locations in the western world... employed for the purpose ... provided with names of people whose social networking experience they are tasked to manipulate because the establishment that runs facebook via via wants people like me vilified and/or isolated from friends, family and everything else that is relevant and important to our lives. This is the only viable explanation for what is going on because the alternative explanation to that does not make sense.

Saying it is all down to settings and the working of facebook algorithms does not explain this in that a line of code once written into the overall code that makes facebook should apply to all users without bias. Also, given personal preferences are sometimes used to direct traffic, the extreme and strange experiences people like me have should in some way reflect the clicks we make while on the social networking site. It makes no sense that notifications of posts by total strangers we do not interact with who may not even be our friends, to some group we belong to, are prioritised over posts by people who are friends, whose profiles we are constantly visiting.

And I should not mention the other bizarre happenings that prove the point.

On top of that, the impact of the business end of the algorithm should be felt more when an account is left in its default settings, when no preferences are made for some posts over others. I have not altered any of the preferences on both my accounts since I set them up other than restrict posts to my profile and set the audience of my posts to "public" from the "friends" default, and have never once manually clicked the follow button on any of my friend's profiles yet.

I have taken it that the follow button is automatically activated when I like a page on Facebook because this is what always happens when I do but know that I do not automatically follow anybody I befriend unless I manually go to their profile and click on the follow button there.

Bottom line is what is happening in my social networking experience and that of others experiencing the same or similar things that I am is abnormal. There is no need to look for faults with settings or me.

I know that many people who are blacklisted because of one thing or another, of which activism is a possible cause, are harassed and psy-oped and generally forced into what are referred to as "echo chambers" in order to both isolate them from people who matter to their lives, and others who are better off hearing what they have to say, as made to hate logging on ... using paid employees sitting in front of monitors monitoring their activities and ensuring that their experience and activities are damned in.

If we need to be dammed in then within the chamber are set loose a slew of those whose posts are pasted into our notifications from the blues, with whom we are expected to connect and be led astray or distracted.

But people being terrorised, harassed and censored this way can fight back and win.

We firstly need to understand the reason we are getting preferential treatment which is that our opinion is of a kind that can make a difference. We are deliberately being isolated because we have something to say that others are better off knowing about. We can defeat this effort to keep us away from others and one of the better ways of doing this is by breaking free of the confines of our profile ... by spending as much of our time engaging in interactions with others on groups, pages, and profiles.

Image from the film Rambo featuring Silvester Stallone showing the protagonist right after the episode where he paints his face to enhance/increase camouflage

We need to start posting everywhere else we can, and manually navigate to close ones we are being kept away from. We need to join and become active in as many groups as we can, and posting to a select number of these groups whenever we get info we feel should be out there, alternating between the groups we post to each time, also switching audiences according to the nature of the post we want to share.

our focus should be on getting our word out and launching from several places at once should be part of our strategy. We should avoid getting attached to a profile or social networking platform.

If, on facebook, we find we are not exposed to variety, we can switch social networking platforms, keeping in mind even when we are followed one to the next, we have a grace period before the surveillance paraphernalia is set up to dam us in, and if we do not wish to switch platforms then we can develop the habit of making status updates in which we post trending "hash tags" we feel we are not seeing in our newsfeed or are not interested in, to self, so that they are not visible to friends. Once posted, we can click on the link that results to be taken to posts about what others are saying about the same thing. For example, posting "#ShotPersonName" to "only you" as the audience, when we seek to hear what people are saying about a police shooting, we can click on the link produced that will lead to posts on the issue to which we can then also respond. This is a good way of being exposed to the range of opinions on an issue as well as having our opinion heard by more people than just those in our friend list.

We can also take to the abundant use of hash tags so that people who think of similar or same hash tags can find us in the social networking maze.

I am doing more than that which I propose above already because I want to defeat their censorship and attempts to create this limited world into which I can conveniently be locked up, and I advise all out there experiencing the same to adopt these, and the many other methods of evasion to get out there when there is need for this, which in most cases is true for activists.

In conclusion, addressing this last bit to a specific audience, to the global Targeted Individual (TI) community to which I belong, who are the most likely to get this treatment, caution should be taken when we get out there that we do not overload non TIs with too much of the kind of information only TIs can relate to, the kind that will label us delusional. We have to go it gently with non TIs when we communicate where they congregate.

Slowly does it, slowly introduce them to our plight by using opportune events, opportune news items, a good example being the Cuba, Uzbekistan, China US embassy attacks that allow us to make the technology we know we are being assaulted with common knowledge ... as opposed to the current state of affairs where it is easy for people to think it is imagined or nonexistent, in language that hints cleverly at our plight.

We should also ensure that when we have to get real with non TIs we are communicating using simple but highly logical and non personal language. We should avoid losing it and display as little emotion as possible because people out there are not really innocent. Most will know who we are and tempt us to make fools of ourselves to discredit the TI cause we fight for.

If in doubt, then it may be necessary to work in groups, to double check our posts with other people, to have others edit or proof read what we post as impression is vital in this war ... and also stand by each other in non TI groups and support or vouch for what the other is saying when it is under fire. We need to go about the whole procedure of introducing our plight to others methodically, scientifically, and systematically.

Related articles:

Facebook Profile Hacks Curiously in Line With The Target Isolation Objective

Sunday, 8 July 2018

What You Need to Know About Gangstalking and Covert Warfare in Western Countries

George Carlin gives his take on America's war culture. The transcript of his stand up fits well with the piece below, if only George would be consulted to allow its posting in the context here lol.

Gangstalking or covert warfare in the west, an activity that manifests in uninvited, extreme invasions of a life by a group of people unknown to the target, a group intent on committing collective harm on one individual "for the sake of it" or to "keep the target out of the game" as opposed to a deterrent, revenge or punishment ... that entails stalking, hounding, harassment, break ins where nothing of much value is necessarily stolen but things are moved around to alert the target to the intrusion, torture, some of which is done in the privacy of the target's own home using through the wall exotic weapons the likes of which have been popularised by the Cuba, Uzbekistan, and China US embassy attacks, is a product of a culture of war or hate. It is what results when the creation within society of an inordinate number of hate Junkies using all manner of tricks, from false flags to media lies about those considered to be outsiders, mandates they be provided with legitimate targets otherwise they will develop into a cancer that eats society from within, so to speak.

Hate junkies can be considered the product of the man's best dreams: they are a walking personification of the negative of what would have been their normal selves. They are warped variants of what they are supposed to be if they developed into well rounded human beings.

Hate junkies are hate filled, hateful people who get a kick from harbouring hate, and an even bigger one from dishing it out or finding an outlet for it which happens best, by design, in a war zone.

So, then, when society is teaming with hate junkies, what happens when it becomes hard or impossible to wage wars on the projected objects of hate? The simple answer to that question is this, that the hate junkies have to be fed something else within the very same society that satisfies this appetite.

To understand why this is the only answer that can be given one has to see that hate junkies are human beings who are the products of the machinations of a hate culture, who have been turned into haters first and humans second, who have not been allowed to know the difference between right and wrong otherwise they would not be hateful for no good reason or cause, who do not battle hate in them or hateful acts towards others but promote the conquest of their very being with hate.

Hate, its expression, and the finding of an outlet is, for them, necessary. It is their cocaine, their heroine, the high they get when a shot of these poisons courses through their arteries and veins to and from the brains.

Thus, no matter how helpless their victim, even when, almost always, their victim has done nothing wrong to them, they will attack hard and long. In fact they get a bigger kick from jumping on somebody when they know their victim has done nothing to deserve the torture they are getting, and an even bigger kick when their victim is absolutely helpless, because then they are sure there will be no repercussions from the target, and, crucially for them and the system's leaders, that the length they can indulge their hate knows only the limitation that people do not live forever. The victim can still serve thousands of hate junkies before expiring.

The victim has to die eventually.

It is, as such, no surprise that people who are old, the severely disabled, those who are loners, who have as a result become isolated and not liable to be helped out of the targeted situation, are picked on the most. It makes perfect sense that those who are not vulnerable are deliberately incapacitated but spared a quick death, if we keep in mind the truth the weapons haters use are capable of causing instant death. The point is to render the victim into such a state the kick from expressing absolute hate on them is prolonged and can as such have more depth to it.

To see the context in which such psychopathy is possible and why it becomes imperative to give it free reign, one has to understand that, in the west, targets of covert warfare are, for gangstalkers and other hate junkies, legitimate targets. This means stalkers have a green light to harass, torture, maim and, when required, to eliminate targets.

You see, without legitimate targets many gangstalkers become people who pose such a threat to law, decency, peace, security and freedom from harm in society they would under normal circumstances be hunted down when identified and put down like animals but ... the reason they are not in the west is because the problem is in reality complex, and there is no will by authority to sort it out because that would require an overhaul of the culture no different in effect from a revolution.

The current leaders in the culture would not come out with their hands on the reigns of control unless by hijack of the process.

Gangstalkers and others who wage covert wars of torture and elimination are aberrant human beings. They are the extreme outcomes of a hate culture. To understand what I mean and come to terms with the fact it is really happening where you live you have to remember the numerous times you were shocked to learn what a man/woman who seemed very normal to people around him/her did in private. Here we are talking those people who had a secret life of murder, torture, kidnap and abuse of others that were accidentally discovered, or unearthed by investigation.

Such people are around us constantly but we never come to know what hides behind the facade until they are exposed. The same is true of hate junkies. There are factors that make the former group of people end up being aberrant and a danger to society, just like there is a factor that makes hate junkies. Hate junkies exist everywhere in western society. They live next door, go with you to work and shop at the same retail outlets. They are model citizens otherwise but behind the scenes they are doing all manner of things that would make the average citizen run away once exposed to the gruelling details.

The dominant war culture excels in making people savour the fact they get a bigger kick from hate than luke warm emotions and then creates a population full of cold hearted people who nonetheless deviate just a little from the norm of human behaviour. This means that this majority poses no real threat to society's cohesion but among them are a few who get absolutely deformed and become a danger to their own society. Rather than eliminate them, the leaders find a use for them that also functions as a means to bring their aberration in line with the rest.

In western societies, these extreme outcomes of the hate culture are set loose on legitimate, easy prey that they can vent their hate on day in and day out. The comparison one can make of them in normal, non western society is that of a lion that has tasted human meat and will not hunt anything else as long as the creature knows that:
1. Humans taste better
2. Humans cannot outrun a chicken
3. Tasty human flesh is easier to tear and chew on than coarse, leather-like animal flesh
4. Human bones are softer

It is not accidental that normal societies of humankind comprising normal people who live in areas where lions abound hunt down and kill any lion that has tasted human flesh because they understand that the creature becomes a danger to human beings exposed by their back see-through doors to the wild ...

Gangstalkers thrive in western countries because these nations are basically war or hate cultures, ie. cultures that foster and encourage hate for people conveniently considered threats, other, illegal or alien (anything that distances them from being of the same evolutionary state of the species to whom the culture purportedly belongs therefore lacking the capacities that make normal evolved superior human beings capable of building or living within and contributing positively to high culture). Observe the numerous prioritised reports of how much crime rises when "illegal people" turn up in western countries (remember here the real possibility most of the crimes are staged).

The rate at which Syrians are raping old women in Germany suggests the third world is exporting serial rapists of old women to the west and reminds me of a statement made by a white American regarding reports of crimes by mainstream media that are committed by African Americans, who are not "illegal people" in America, nor do they specialize in raping 90 year olds, but their projection as enemies is promoted in order to justify their inferior status and danger potential to white civilisation and the subsequent treatment the status prompts from those tasked with preserving law and order. Here was this man, who happened to be white, wondering out loud whether the black guy being arrested every single night on television was the same guy over and over again, an actor paraded with handcuffs so black people could be painted in the wrong light, and feared if not hated.

Fostering or instilling hate within the psyches of the ruling group is an easy way of preparing them for all out conflagrations with others they are made to see as threats, "useless eaters" who are clear and present dangers to as much their way of life as their very lives. They can then let their sons, wives, husbands, cousins, and daughters go to fight the enemy abroad without feeling the war is not legitimate or that it does not benefit them. They can watch drone strikes abroad in which people are killed as dealing with their short and long term security. They will not feel anything for an enemy they already hate deeply and would rather was exterminated.

Alien humans, then, become akin to the enemy ethnicity in WWII Germany that Hitler said would lead to the ruin of civilisation if they were allowed to prosper within.

Note that this is a very convincing justification for gassing millions until other factors are considered.

This requirement to wage continuous war on others in order to thrive economically as a systemic orientation necessitates false flags that repeatedly and emphatically embed in the psyche of the populace at large the hate required to support genocidal military and economic wars on no good aliens who just rape and steal, otherwise want to bring TERROR to others for no good reason ... maybe because bringing terror to others is their proven nature, even when they are not the ones making profit from it, but who, when attacked, get absolutely savaged by people who are the least of their enemies, people who have been brainwashed into feeling extreme hate for people who have done nothing wrong to them realistically.

The truth of this is the hate is instilled just so a small group in leadership roles can rob, pillage, and steal the best of the very aliens who, by such hateful actions, end up beggars either peddling a beggar's bowl internationally or migrate to better their lives elsewhere, and we know the bulk of these people do not head for western countries that have more or less closed all safe entries to their countries. Europe could care less for the dangerous mediterranean waters that are supposed to kill as many as deters the rest and America cares less for the rapes and murders and child abductions in the desert bordering Mexico as long as this scares potential aliens from making the journey.

The dangerous stretches of land and water become issues when thousands of deaths and abductions appear not to be deterring aliens. Then we get talk of walls or the appearance of East and Southern European right wing extremist leaders who want to throw anybody who makes it through the dangerous waters back in, and we all know where the werewithal enabling the rise of these leaders is coming from given aliens have their ambitions set on more than these relatively impoverished lands.

This dirty game fortunately comes back to haunt the hate culture's elite, and herein lies hope that it will be defeated.

Unbeknownst to most people in the west, a significant percentage of people being gang stalked and tortured, in the west itself and elsewhere, feed the appetites for hate that develop when hate overflows and has to be allowed legitimate outlets to prevent it eating society from within. This is to say targets of covert warfare in the west are not all being experimented upon without their consent. Many, in fact the vast majority serve as outlets for hate that the very culture generates.

Only this explains the extents gangstalking and targeting gangs are known to go in their outrageous "hate crimes" on their hapless, legitimate victims. Governments step in to corner the victims on the web and in society so there is no escape for them. If they report what is happening to them to the police they are promptly placed in straitjackets. If they launch activism on the web nobody shows solidarity because nary an information site, including all wikis, doesn't sport an array of articles full of quotes from health professionals describing their symptoms as the products of delusions, including a "new kind of international madness". However, health organs such as the CDC in America refuse to investigate this new condition that has people on a worldwide scale reporting similar to same experiences.

Tupac's belly "THUG LIFE" tattoo

The abbreviation THUG LIFE that Tupac Shakur tattooed on his belly that means "The Hate U Give Little Infants F*ck Everybody" is in fact a truism. Not only are people living in communities within the hate culture in peril because of the hate that is constantly being stoked using all manner of well coordinated tricks, tactics, and strategies that involve false flags and well timed and orchestrated public speeches and demonstrations that play on people's emotions and abuse sensibilities, but everybody else outside the cultural sphere is in trouble and suffers.

For westerners, the hate given by the elite to infants does inevitably come back home to "roost" (f*ck everybody), because it can only be satisfied through ever expanding covert warfare on unsuspecting people, and the requirement is that this happens within the same hate culture's majority's upper, middle and lower classes as well as the gamut of social strata in minority or even illegal alien communities, singling out the most vulnerable and, among them are the others authority is afraid of, such as activists, whistleblowers and conscientious objectors.

Actually, nobody in society is exempt, as far as the record goes.

Failure to allow hate to be legitimately expressed results in hate junkies lurking around in parks and dark alleys looking for victims to vent their hate on. This is basically similar to another situation that has scientifically been proven.

It has been ascertained that banning prostitution and making it impossible for prostitutes to go underground puts women in that society at a heightened risk of rape, even in broad daylight, by wayward men who have failed to find an easy, convenient and legitimate outlet for pent-up sexual desires.

Now you know ...

Thursday, 28 June 2018

Plausible Explanation for a Continent's Bizarre Soccer Record

Poignant sight of the wreckage showing the cockpit of the plane carrying the Zambian football team that perished when the plane crashed, killing all on board. The biggest loss for Zambian football, perhaps, was the death in the crash of the coach, Godfrey Chitalu.

Might just have an over-active imagination to look at it the way I do but, cannot help myself. They say healthy paranoia is a reflection the realisation has dawned that things are more connected than one previously thought.

This is my issue.

African players do exceptionally well in well known European and far eastern football teams. They have produced some of the best players leagues here have known, for instance Didier Drogba, etc., yet ... come the world cup, the continent doesn't fare well at all.

When I look at this in depth, and I have taken this issue apart several times before, CSI Miami style, I can but make one conclusion: foul play. Foul play not in the form of corruption, or defiling by biological agents which might get obvious, but in the form of weaponry firing invisible bullets that don't just injure, but can cause confusion, without leaving signs they were used, weaponry in the hands of a group keen on ensuring a kind of people win because they do not want some facts about this continent to become clear ... and here I speak of them using the kind of silent weapons used in the Cuba/Uzbekistan/China USA Embassy attacks to achieve this.

I know what you will say to this. You will ask why they do not do the same to Brazil if the motivation is racism?

I think they do not touch Brazil and some other South American teams "as much" because of two things:

1) Mentality: South Americans are too open to issues globally. They are also more open with their feelings. They will discuss issues Africans would rather consider better to keep to their own selves. This has to do with cultural sensibilities, the kind that make Africans easy targets of covert attacks. South American society is also more advanced than African society. People in South America have as a result broader imaginations on average than Africans. Players here will definitely notice as well as talk when things do not seem right. Somebody will eventually put two and two together and point out an external influence.
2) The performance on the international stage of South American countries pre-dates the advent of the tech that can cause athletic under performance. Also, where quality has already been ascertained, questions will be asked if things change for the worst.

FYI I do not subscribe to the idea the fault is because Africa is allowed to send too few teams to the world cup either. This is a sign of bias of course, but exceptional ability should shine through no matter how few the numbers of exceptional teams in the groups. South Americans do well whether they have two or just one team past the group stage.

I also do not subscribe to the other rationale circulating around that says Africans are not very ambitious? They will be happy with a position among the top teams? Problem with this is the desire to win is universal. people will always do their best in tournaments. A good number of African players lead their teams from major league to premier league victory in European and far eastern countries, scoring the goals that clinch the victories. What more proof do we need that Africans do not go to tournaments with the mindset of being satisfied with a group stage success?

Let's consider a factor that always gets me to the point I cannot help seeing foul play using exotic weapons ...

Africa's juniors or under twenties do way better than the senior teams, and consistently at that. They are a force to be reckoned with. Ghana won the FIFA U-20 world cup in 2009 and have managed to be third since. Africa U-20s have emphatically defeated the big names in football, repeatedly, so why the under performance of the grown lads?

Could it be that African men become redundant after 20? But what about blacks in America? In the NBC? Some get better as they grow older. Hmmm.

Is it what we eat in Africa that has not yet affected the younger people because they have not chewed on too much of it yet? But players like Didier and many others, raised on African food, played well into their mid thirties. Hmmm.

Whatever it is, the under performance seems to only hit right before the games, apparently, because our teams do very well in friendlies with major footballing nations before major matches. The Zambian team that perished by plane crash in 1993 defeated major teams by margins that were shocking. They defeated Italy by 4-0 then repeated this score line with Guatemala, a South American team that is not a walkover. Come the actual championship this record was hardly expressed ... Hmmm ...

If I was coaching African players, I would have them sleeping in faraday cages surrounded by rubber walls ... seriously. I remember thinking this after I had done the math, when I remembered a bizarre injury on the field in Europe. Cisse, the current Senegal coach, broke his leg some time back in a manner that had me thinking the point at which it broke had been receiving invisible bullet bombardment as he slept. Cisse's leg broke as he ran, without a rough tackle on him. How strange is that?

Or maybe I am just too paranoid? Lol.

Tuesday, 19 June 2018

The AI Debater: The Next Frontier For an Idea Theft Culture's Dreams of World Domination

Two AI robots Sophia & Han debate the future of humanity on youtube. Click the image to be taken there ...

The pomp surrounding the computer that can argue as well as the very best human thinkers out there and the surrounding attempts to present the computer as a more reliable means of arriving at truths, even if by way of potential, has roots in a culture that has taken to idea theft as the only realistic method of advancement.

This is exactly what people mean when they speak of an inadequacy complex or the lack of trust in one's own ability to sort issues out, and also of one's own lack of faith in one's own viability, leading to the addiction to get direction and guidance by not consulting with self or other people ... but actually turning into a quasi parasite, even though actively denying this state, and though it can be rationalised that man is always going to fall short on thoughtfulness, and a helping hand in a machine is always a plus, that no boundary that separates how much a machine can mentally benefit man can be drawn, some thought needs to be made about this ...

The program that plays chess with you is basically a predictive/pre-emptive algorithm. It is mathematics in use at base. One plus one equals reaction or pre-emptive move.

This is represented quite bluntly by a computer program's "IF" or "WHEN" "condition A" is met or not then machine executes a set line of code as an activity.

Line of code

But then, as we all may know, computer programs that are programmed to win chess games cannot just be check mated and defeated, they can become too predictable, and not just for the very best chess players out there.

Part of the reason for this is computer programs do not and can never have actual spatial awareness save that left in the programing language by the programmer. They therefore are not geometric in their rationalisation meaning they could only accidentally produce the better logic that works all the time under what ever circumstances that arise. They can not get body language feedback from their opponent save that which the programmer includes in snippets here and there in their programming. Well, maybe a good thing because they then cannot deliver emotional judgements but then they cannot have real telepathy because of this lack except artificial which is always going to be inferior. Their pronouncements should be suspect because they will be inhumane as a result and if you have had enough of inhumane and immoral behaviour then you ain't seen nothing yet! Just wait till Robots are what we rely on for the imprisonement of our children.

Fact of this matter is a computer lacks consciousness as we understand it, and though this represents a weakness on the chess board, it is a major drawback in terms of debating issues that have a bearing on consciousness, including such unlikely areas of debate as government policy.

The argument pundits of a thinking computer put forth in favour of the machine's superiority is that it will be objective given a machine can argue any which way. Unfortunately for this group, the fact remains machines programmed to argue can usually only do this in two directions or dimensions alone, whereas humankind can argue on more planes than just two.

But is this inadequacy with which a program pursues arguments both ways worth relying on and why is it so hard to see that there will aways be limitations to how deeply into an issue a computer will delve and argue given it forever lacks capacities needed for sound judgements?

Imagine for a while that an abstract such as existentialism was the subject of debate. Would it not be wise to use a computer's capacity to argue two ways as a reference guide for humans involved in the discussion, a way of checking what they could have missed? This would make a machine much more useful than actually confronting it to give a guru's objective point of view?

Note here that an opportune variation in a point of view would be a feat for a computer to accomplish but is it not enough knowing the thing can never savour basic consciousness to disqualify it from participation in any discussions till it possesses a basic, viable and autonomous consciousness?

I see in the hurry to sell a reasoning computer to some third word country the need to do away with balanced human reasoning, especially of the exceptional kind that occasionally makes a contribution that impacts significantly on the direction taken and spoils or foils some control freak culture's aspiration to deceive and rule.

Idea theft is a cultural orientation the current leaders in the dominant culture adopted from the Greeks. This is a fact. Certainly, much of the progress this culture has attained was at the cost of somebody's freedom or even life, with the added bonus of the afflicted or targeted being but a fallible human being, therefore the switch to stealing ideas from a computer would be the next step ... a positive thing if not for a few facts that will relegate the use of computers for guidance and inspiration to the ruled and enslaved.

Basically, reliance on computers will lead to the same creative bankruptcy and activities that have so disgraced the dominant culture as the previous method because it is ultimately the same thing inasmuch as the reasoning is an aggregate of what are thought of as the best thoughts out there, filtered and picked out by what people involved in the programming think are the better thoughts among the total they have been exposed to, censored by the space and time required to fit the collected thoughts into one program.

The programmers are sure they have the best thoughts as well as the best manners of thought out there, or have they really?

Idea theft is a cultural orientation that only a low brow latches on to, no two ways about this. Anybody outside the idea thief's cultural imperialism bracket thinking this is the better way of forging ahead is really deluded.

Related Articles: Idea Thieves

Wednesday, 30 May 2018

Freemasons Live: How My Targeting Began and Continues to Date

Picture showing me in the center sitting with family members shortly before leaving for Europe in 1983

It all started in the summer of 1989 in Utrecht, a student town in the center of the Netherlands. After a brief brush with the Freemasons that lasted some 5 months, strange things started happening to me.

When I finally picked up on the anomalies and realized I was under covert attack, I initially could only suspect who was responsible. Though it was clear to me that somebody out there was out to get me, I could hardly tell who it was or relate what was happening to me to anyone else because it was being done in such a way as to be near impossible to know who was behind it or unbelievable when told.

Suddenly, I realized I had to be afraid for my life, and would soon go on a helter skelter run, not really knowing who to run to, where to run to ... never again to trust anyone, ever to look over my shoulder ... moving around like a rolling stone, with all that I consumed in my bag rather than the fridge or cupboard because my home was being entered and I had experienced poisoning symptoms after eating.

View of st Antonius hospital in Overvecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, a stone throw away from my flat in the neighbourhood where my targeting intensified. I would later leave the flat when it became too unsafe, opting to sleep in my car

Unknown persons had started making surreptitious entries into my home and other properties, such as cars or external storerooms ... without stealing anything, my door locks would all get their cylinders broken while that of immediate neighbours, including people I rented my home to who replaced the locks I left behind, were left alone.

How I initially responded to these sudden invasions into my life is crucial to how my life has turned out to be. Had I not stayed believing in my perceptions and kept the courage to devise survival strategies that could be considered a sign of some mental challenge, that, however, steered me clear of getting considered insane, that lessened the amount of poisonous substances I would otherwise have consumed, that I have kept till today, I would most probably be dead, in a wheelchair, or the like.

For example, only cooking enough to consume while I was at home, meaning never leaving food over to eat when I returned, in the hope of minimising the chances of poisoning or the quantity of poisons I consumed actually did do just this. I remember of some instances when I left food at home that I did experience unimagined, actual poisoning after consumption.

Cylinder lock

Leaving a locking mechanism, factory made or improvised, on the door, to warn me of surreptitious entry did in fact do just that. I caught several attempts to invade my home and discouraged such entries to the point they have almost dropped to zero today.

And so on.

The Freemasons came into my life at a time when I was in serious trouble. They were quick to offer help, quick to indulge my gargantuan appetite for knowledge. I got to tour their lodge in Utrecht and was not lonesome come the festive season.

They were for me an innocuous group that happened to be there. I could not see anything wrong with their offers of help and did not as such seek alternatives. I could never have dreamt that they could have initiated something as dastardly as this covert war on me. I put it beyond them to start the campaign that they did in the years that followed the initial meeting ... a campaign designed to create a stockholm syndrome-like mindset that they hoped would get me on all fours, crawling, begging to be let in ... if only I could be freed from the terror being unleashed on my life.

Bronx Zoo masonic Symbol of the fierce guardian role they play in the dominant culture. The flanking lion and lioness (often represented as pillars) are the freemasons, while what they guard, spirituality, is in the form of a middle pillar circled by a snake in this case. Their "job" to keep secrets and high creativity in people owned and controlled by them and hidden from the sleeping majority hiding right out in the open in the form of a "zeal to protect and promote invaluable spirituality", if you get curious. Is it any wonder these vile patrons are considered beyond reproach in the culture?

It took time, hindsight, before the whole episode became clear. The smoke cleared and the real face of the beast was revealed to me, and it was then that I saw that it was familiar.

I realized the Freemasons were in fact responsible for what I had gone through, and also saw with this who they really were, and by this I mean what their role in the system is ... especially regarding individuals like me. As guardians of truths that cannot be released to the general public, Freemasons also have the duty of seeing to it that these truths are not arrived at indirectly, by rationalisation or logical deduction. They have to ensure they are there when the likelihood of the truths being uncovered occurs, and see to it that they stop this from happening They have to put under observation and surveillance and be ever on the lookout for those in the position and with the potential to arrive at these truths. Such people, who it is known fit a personality profile, have to get lured into one or other secret society and, if this is not possible, prevented from mental coagulation or attaining any phase in life that puts them beyond covert control that doesn't raise eyebrows or bring realities about the secret society they keep away from normal, everyday people.

This revelation about the Freemasons came to me due in part to the fact I never made any move with the potential to compromise their society, meaning they attacked me covertly even though I had not done anything wrong. I did not get in, therefore could not have broken an oath.

The masonic temple in Utrecht, The Netherlands

There was a lot of giving on their part, it is true, but then I did not get committed as a result of getting this help. Not that I am unthankful but facts remain facts. Their help was not meant to be given in exchange for something else that, if not reciprocated, would result in covert attacks.

What should be known is that I declined their invitation to join their group rather like a man /woman would if, after a night stand, they find that nothing has changed ... they still have their eyes fixed on something better. There was nothing worth joining for, and so I went my own way.

If everything had been normal, the Freemasons would also have dusted themselves off, acknowledged a failure to gain a member, and gone their way.

However, unbeknownst to me, much unwanted evil followed me along this way I took, bringing along much discreditation, massive disruption, destruction, suffering and misery not just to my life, but also to close ones, especially if they were helpful ... to the communities I chose to reside in, and so forth. These attacks have been getting worse in intensity and more complex as technology improves ... the mainstay remaining all typical COINTELPRO methodology, the methods that discredit, disrupt, imprison, etc.

Everything is being done to make me a leper in society, to make me imprison myself, to destroy all that I have contributed to freedom fights worldwide, to frustrate my efforts to survive with dignity, to help myself out of shame and an increasing loss of sense of self-esteem, self-worth.

If I took you by the hand and showed you all that they are doing to me, especially how immediate and permanent their presence is, if only you experience for yourself how lights in my home flicker if I just trip up or drop something, how brightly a candle burns and how fast it expires as a result, how quickly batteries discharge, how my home can smell like a power station and yield extremely high RF readings that are abnormal for civilian households, how spectrum analyser detect constant sounds when the environment is completely quiet ... you would flea from the scene, never to venture into my abode again, for you would have witnessed evil only replicated in the worst haunting movies such as "The Entity". You would in fact be witness to a bizarre haunting.

Spectrum analyzer image showing constant lines indicating sounds outside human hearing range

The question on your mind would be "why". The Freemasons can only do what they are doing to me if what I am is the problem, not what I do or did.

Let me be clearer.

It cannot be about whatever it is that I did, but the potential of the man. It is about what I am capable of doing, how I am designed genetically, by the almighty, or nature, whatever your belief is. What the Freemasons are doing to me and many others ... what they have done to others in the past and will continue to do in the future as long as they see the need, is already known. Novels have been written over this issue, blockbuster films shot about this, albeit in ways that concentrate on the moral of the story as opposed to telling it as it is and pointing out the devil.

The Freemasons and their counterparts know that their role in the system and the agenda they serve is known. But, and this is crucial, they know there is a difference between merely knowing something and knowing what to do with what you know. At this point in time, many of those who know do not know how to use what they know to affect positive change, and by this I mean stop the evil by removing or destroying the insulting factor as such bringing sanity to this system, if not change it.

Thus, the evil ones race ahead knowing the point when the critical number that know and can use what they know to affect systemic change can be reached if they do not act, sure they will maintain the current account as long as they leave no stones unturned, as they go about the process of eliminating or incapacitating threats to their reign. It is a fact today that, by successfully isolating their targets and manipulating opinion, they manage to make it look like it's somebody else's problem or that the target did something wrong.

This war we face will only be won when enough people realize the connections their lives have to the few under attack, and know also that the intentions of the powers-that-be are reflected in the terror they unleash to the few marked ones. Anyone who isolates another and does terrible things to them, only to rebound into society knowing/because the rest do not know what they did is a threat to everyone else given they will repeat the act once they are alone with another.

They are free to commit horrendous acts in a situation where people who know the difference between right and wrong would not. They will never do something to another without being seen because, unless the one they are doing it to is blind, they are being seen.

They are definitely not preparing a bed of roses for anyone, Africans and those they consider other in particular.

The extremely cruel, insane and clearly sick ways they torture people who have never done anything to them says but one thing: they do not mean well. They have never meant well for most people. A lot of people would run away if all they have been up to and their plans for tomorrow were revealed.

Today, they come for one poor soul, tomorrow it will be any other poor soul, which could be a father, their child, etc. They will do this because of the ease with which they have made it look like somebody else's problem in the past. At issue is the ease with which too many people flea from those who get marked. This alone gives the room required for the exercise to continue. The evil ones can come back anytime they want knowing the majority will simply run away from the individual marked anew.

They will run from friends and family, from those they pledged to protect before the mark was etched on their person.

The truth of this matter is that only the evil ones know the criteria by which they choose their targets. There is as such no way of knowing whether what one is doing will get them in trouble or not in an environment where nobody knows what could or could not get them in trouble with these hidden figures.

This is a war faced by all, and it is folly and foolish to not acknowledge this ... especially in the hope this stance will ward off attacks. In actual fact, those to blame for the fate of targets are not the targets themselves, not what they have done, but what their community fails to do. Here, it is clear that we can speak of communities being the ones to blame for what others in their midst are going through, for not reacting appropriately in a war being waged on all, for failing to see the truth the isolation, torture and elimination of individuals is a way of taking people power away from the community at large ... A way of tightening the chains that bind all.

For targets, it gets very personal, and only because of the isolation that has successfully been affected. Targets alone in their home get attacked blatantly, clearly, because they are lone and nobody else can see what is happening. When a target tries to mingle then they are made unpleasant, they are made to not fit in. They become undesirable and have to go back to solitude.

Other instances when it gets personal as opposed to surreptitious include what can be considered attempts to block communication and attacks on family and others who help out. In the former case, the phone 's batteries are hit with a frequency that causes almost immediate discharge, for example. A display showing a full charge can move from full to empty in a few minutes.

This will happen when communicating or writing. The battery itself would not have shown any signs it cannot hold a charge before suddenly discharging.

They seek absolute isolation.

As proof from my own life of how blatant they can sometimes be with their attacks ... I once poured 8 litres of water into a double foam mattress and used it as an extra shield when heat blasts from up above became too much, when sitting outside the house in the middle of the night was preferable to going inside. I remember the heat I would feel as soon as I went inside, heat so intense I felt it on the leading limb, that shocked even I, a veteran in such things.

Wonder upon wonder, I woke up in the middle of the night sweating profusely to find the mattress had dried after a mere 2 hours or so, on a night a cotton shirt could not. I repeated the exercise using the same two litre container, pouring it empty four times, ensuring the fluid was poured evenly so that the foam could absorb all the water, checking that it was not draining. I got into a cooler bed and fell asleep almost immediately, but would awake after the same amount of time to find the thick material crisp dry.

Now, that's 8 litres evaporating twice out of a thick mattress on a cold night. This result cannot be achieved through drying under a blistering sun, but only if it were possible to put the wet mattress into a dryer, cancelling out thoughts of what the water will do to the electricity and other parts of the machine.

The tin foil hat that has protected my brains well

Just now as I sat here writing this, I felt my body armour heating up and put my hand to the corrugated iron roof to see if there were temperature changes in some areas. I found it had heated up in two circular spots in front and behind me (north east and north west of me) while there is persistent cloud cover, meaning it is not the sun heating up separate spots on my roof.

My poor head ...

Fact remains, and it should be noted and emulated, that I would be a drivelling idiot if not for my insistence on, and persistence with wearing, at all times, the much derided "tin foil hat", upwards of 50 layers of it to boot, while I stick my middle finger out at that anachronistic, foolish, gratuitously murderous fraternity called the Freemasons.

The freemasons and the system they defend can be defeated. I am a typical example of a lone man who has survived the worst their military units can mete out, and do not let anybody lie to you about that fact. You see, they want people to believe they have super powerful weapons that can kill at once but they just don't want to kill for nothing. They are good guys involved in charity who have no reason to kill for nothing and, besides, guys like me who are nut cases are supposed to be too unimportant for them to even think about.

Yet they sneak around altering text in articles I post here, cloning my social networking profiles so they can discredit me by communicating information that does this to people I know, control the algorithm on such sites so that I get isolated, turn every home I live in into a haunted house with freemason ghosts, etc.

Clearly, what they are really afraid of doing is engaging. They elevate my status when they engage me directly on my allegations. They make people pay attention to what I am saying and, what's worse is they cannot win any argument I will use to prove what I say let alone disprove hard evidence. They do not have anybody in their house that could possibly outthink me for starters.

Don't get me wrong! I know they have weapons with terrifying destructive capabilities. The weapons they use can kill, but the people the Freemasons hand us in to are instructed to murder us. Snag is there should not be a smoking gun. I do not need to talk of all the attempts on my life to prove they mean to kill.

The weapons they use may be formidable but can be foiled. Nothing man made cannot be deciphered by man and foiled by him. People are right now as we speak devising ever better shields against the worst in their arsenal, while the murderers keep screaming on top of their voices that shielding is useless so their targets lower their guards by refusing to shield.

If they do enentually get me then know this is not because my shielding was useless against their tech, but because they hit me with an overkill intensity and an overkill of plants in the places my body would pass before cremation in order to hide the truth of the overkill from people. My methods work and anybody shielding right now is on the right path because defeating the capacity of their weapons to cause harm is the way they will be destroyed.

If I had not been protecting myself thus far, I would be too stupid to even turn a smartphone on let alone make any sense if I managed to communicate. I would be finding being coherent the most difficult thing to do. As things stand I am still here ... still a heavy hitter dishing rapid "rat a tat tats!" on that anachronism !!! Now imagine we were all doing this to them? This is the only way they will be sent back to the past where they escaped from.

Pay attention!

Saturday, 26 May 2018

Knight Among the Living Dead

Almost all the millions of us in the total number of countries the western elite control globally, are living in an open prison, held here at the whims and mercies of a psychopathic western elite, who evidently use the most depraved of all the depraved methods history has known, to keep us imprisoned in their hell, to retain a stranglehold on power.

Understand that if you have heard of targeting, ie. the isolation, assaulting and torturing of select people that results in the destruction of that life, and you are sure you are not targeted, you need to understand that you are also undergoing some form of attack but have yet to notice. Difference is that you are not prioritised, yet. But you can very easily become a priority target like me and many others, at any time, because the precipitation is unknown.

This means that you do not yet know what it takes to get you on the list. This further means there is nothing you can do to keep from being put on the list ... Unless you accept this non complex, uncomfortable truth.

And there is another truth to this that you are better off knowing about, and if you think I am paraphrasing after reading this then yes I am ... because the point cannot be stressed enough!

The difference between you and a targeted individual is simply the fact his/her suffering is overt and constant. The gloves have come off for that particular individual whereas they have not for you. This does not mean you are not under fire. You are but yours is intermittent, occurring when you do not conform to rules, or when hidden figures of authority in the system think you need covert attacks to make you suitable for one thing or another.

If you are ignorant of this truth, which is really not usual among people worldwide, and believe when told or shown evidence that covert warfare is really happening, but think that you are somewhat exempt ... then the day will come in your life, as it has in countless others, that you will run into the ugly truth. This will happen when you are made to know there will be serious consequences if you do not obey an order you find heinous, such as prevent someone doing something good for you and environment, aid some no-good person in a crime, etc. You cannot discount the fact you may get forced to commit murder, murder no less of someone close or dear to you.

You might find yourself a priority target simply because you saw what you were not supposed to see or were at the wrong place at the wrong time.

Now, what kind of an existence is that? what are those odds we are supposed to be up against? doesn't nature present enough odds to our well being?

Think about this ...

Human beings pride their own selves of being the most evolved creatures on earth who live better than all other creatures because of this. Should we not be the ones adding less odds to survival of each and every one of us than the others?

If that be a manner of making us better then let that fact be explained if indeed it's a fact.

Otherwise the truth of that could just be that we have overrated ourselves?

Think about the fact you might be a police officer, a judge, or a nurse in a hospital, homeless bum, etc., and the afore mentioned happens to you. You find yourself suddenly up against the "they will destroy your life if you interfere or do not do as they say". Then you find yourself doing what they want you to do. You find yourself killing your wife.

Then, and only then will the realisation dawn that you live in a prison that is not worth doing what they command for. This realisation should not come so late in your existence within this culture if only you would acknowledge that right now and rebel.

Accept now that the reality of life in this culture is ALL of us, targets and so called non targets, have to get fed poisons and shoved into an environment of harmful substances, including radio wave smog, to become worse with upcoming 5G. This is done for a simple reason: to make us too dumbed down to reject the message projected daily that we must obey psychopaths because they know what they are doing and it is good for us and environment.

THEY want us to be too thick to think strait so that the best thought we can master is precisely this, that there is no alternative to this eternal, wonderful, mighty, beautiful, God sent, Jesus blessed, nature friendly system, that to rebel against it or want it altered is folly..

If you accept to live like this, if you accept to take the way things are as normal, then do not say I did not say so when they come for you.

In the meantime understand my conviction is total and my conviction is a conclusion arrived at by logical deduction so do not waste your time telling me I will be better off if I did not dwell on it, let alone tell me salvation and peace for me lies in not rocking their boat.

Get it into that head of yours I am what stands between your state and freedom and you are what I need to change to see freedom. I am that stepping stone to our mutual redemption that they deny you by focussing the fire on me first, then you next once they realise you have slipped their grasp.

If you do not understand a thing I have said then you really drank up on that stuff they brew, so much so it did not just take the fight out of you, but turned you into a the lifeless zombie whose bite turns you into its kind.

Also remember that the guy that comes up with a real life threat of punishment that is also the biggest fear people can think of controls the masses. He gets their undivided obedience. They Obey HIM and not the other guy with a weaker, more useless punishment.

He has the ultimate deterrent to disobedience and can only be controlled by defeating his violence with bigger violence. This is how it works and should not bother you and deter you from action because life goes on in the end!