The Tragedy With Africa

The tragedy with (or of) Africa is that we are our worst enemies when it comes to ruining things for ourselves.

You want us to ruin the future of our children? Just make us do it ourselves. Give us some cash, or treats and trinkets, and we'll kill off our own best, for example. Our enemies don't do these things for us. We do it ourselves ... and the fact it's at their behest is secondary. 

I rather abstain from using the word "we" in this. I prefer to separate Africans into those who are awake and the other group I call conscious and unconscious proxies of our enemies. This last group is what the African Deep State, created by the west before they handed power back to the natives, consists of. 

In Africa, we have entire communities that are supported by western monies, and few people know this. Our deep state is in the middle of every community whether in the suburbs or villages, and they are trained to spot our best and "get them on the rise", so to speak. 

So, it's not just those in leadership positions who are in danger. It's not just the Magufuli's and Nkrumah's who have their lives at stake. 

Have Africans ever wondered why Africa is the only continent where the observation has been made and confirmed that good people die young or go too soon? Here we are talking about the most industrious, philanthropic, creative people within families and communities. This observation, about a weird phenomenon that has been taken to be a natural occurrence in Africa, isn't made due to a mistake in reasoning, meaning it isn't based solely on noticing deaths because of their impact on one's life, for example. 

What is revealing is the fact this occurrence doesn't apply to people in cultures outside the African continent, for instance Europe or China. If any African wants to verify this, then just ask your Chinese, Arabian or European friends (if you have any) if they have ever heard of this phenomenon before. 

Note that this belief exists in ALL African countries, not just one. 

The truth of this matter is the fact the good people dying young in Africa are our best and they are being eliminated by an embedded Deep State that's trained to do just this. This may sound ridiculous or far fetched but it is verifiable. 

The activity continues because the perpetrators don't know that this is what they are doing otherwise they would stop. Their levels of understanding, intelligence, egos and emotions are what are being (ab)used to make it all possible. 

To repeat, it's being done to prevent Africans from getting developmental contributions from their (our) best.

Another truth that lies within the same statement in the meme above by Patrice Lumumba is the fact ballot box democracy is inimical to the best interests of African people. This is a fact that cannot be denied. The way things are, this system is the way Africans are controlled to their detriment. As one African writer whose name I forget once said, "we did win independence, but we lost it again at the ballot box". 

Witness the sellout monsters Africans put into positions of power, and weep. The situation isn't very different from the west in that sense except the fact Africans are in a lose lose situation compared to western masses. This is to say we lose much more compared to them given our very existence as a race is at stake.

And it figures why countries like China, that have developed by leaps and bounds, do not entertain the idea of a ballot box system of governance. They understand that they will forfeit their potential as a people at that ballot box. 

Thoughts on Will Smith's Assault on Chris Rock

I think people who have come out saying this was all a staged Kabal gimmick to distract us from the real issues around the globe are jumping the gun. This wasn't staged at all. This was Will Smith doing the unthinkable and the fact it can happen in everyday life doesn't change that.

The Kabalistic elites running Hollywood organize the Oscars to promote Hollywood productions, and it just so happens that Pfizer was also in on the promotion side and they happen to have a drug on the market for alopecia, a side effect of its mRNA vaccine, believe it or not. They would definitely have sought attention for the condition, and the medication, but to do it this way?

Bottom line is this was a day for the Kabal running Hollywood to promote themselves and if they attracted attention in the wrong way then they would suffer the consequences.

Attracting attention through a distasteful act of violence is definitely one of those things that could trigger the negative rapport, because anyone who is OK with what happened has probably never been hit by a powerful man. As we advise our kids, ‘use your words’.

Furthermore, while there may be some room for speculation over the slap itself, Smith’s anger as he shouted at Rock certainly seemed 100% genuine.

In the aftermath of the incident, footage shows Denzel Washington consoling Smith during an ad break, the latter wiping away tears. Smith also wept during an acceptance speech that looked a deeply troubled one for him, despite the fact he had just reached what is the pinnacle of a film actor’s career. Apologising to the Academy and his fellow nominees but not Rock.

He said: "Art imitated life; I look the crazy father, just like they said about Richard Williams. Love will make you do crazy things.” If all that was make-believe, he deserves a lorryload of Oscars.

There is another aspect to this whole incident that doesn't support the view it was staged. In the aftermath of the slap, it was allowed to reverberate throughout the event with Chris Rock doing the unthinkable. He acted as if nothing had happened and didn't even rub the cheek that had been hit. If the scenario was put in script then the instructions he would have been given would be to get slapped, pretend he had been hit, then act as if nothing had happened.

The police or security at the venue would be instructed not to step in to escort Will Smith out, even when his behavior remained threatening after he had assaulted someone.

Now, the assault alone would have been grounds for immediate arrest because it was viewed by those who would have needed the evidence to proceed with the detention of Will Smith.

These are all factors that those who would have planned the incident would have had to consider prior to the fact because they would have been aware of the lingering bad taste it would leave in both the mouths of those present and viewers at home had they not stepped in and did as I indicate above. Chris Rock himself would have been required to feign injury and an inability to continue with his hosting for it to be in sync with the continuation of the event. All this would have been pre-planned because it would have brought closure to the incident and allowed the awards to proceed without the ghost of the incident haunting them as much as it did that day or night, without people wondering whether the man presenting the awards was in pain or not, whether he would be attacked again or not.

Remember here that Will Smith threatened to do it again in his manner in the immediate aftermath, and also that he didn't find it necessary to apologize to Chris initially even though he apologized to everybody else present.

What seems clear is that Rock’s joke about Pinkett-Smith crossed a line. It is absolutely believable that it could cause significant offence. As Pinkett-Smith told a 2018 episode of her Facebook Watch series Red Table Talk, her alopecia has caused her considerable suffering. “It was terrifying when it first started,” she said. “I was in the shower one day and had just handfuls of hair in my hands and I was just like, ‘Oh, my God, am I going bald?' It was one of those times in my life where I was literally shaking with fear.”

It has also been pointed out that Smith and Pinkett-Smith do have some previous rifts with Rock, having been on the receiving end of another Oscars ribbing by the 57-year-old in 2016. Reacting to the pair’s decision to boycott that year’s awards over a lack of diversity in the nominees, Rock, who was hosting the ceremony, said:

“Jada said she’s not coming. I was like, ‘Isn’t she on a TV show?’ Jada’s gonna boycott the Oscars? Jada boycotting the Oscars is like me boycotting Rihanna’s panties. I wasn’t invited!” Rock also took aim at Smith, saying: “It’s not fair that Will was this good [in the movie Concussion] and didn’t get nominated. It’s also not fair that Will was paid $20 million for Wild Wild West!”

But still, Will Smith hitting Chris Rock for offending his wife is unathema for anybody who knows and has followed the two. There is no comparison to what's wrong with that picture. Imagine that this wasn't Chris Rock, but Jay Leno who told a bad joke and got a member of the audience walk up to the stage and b*tch slap him for it. On top of that, he goes back to his seat and shouts, audibly, that Jay should keep whoever out of his dirty mouth.

A comedian has a dirty mouth now?

Comedians can cross the line sometimes and when this happens we don't expect people to walk up to the stage and punch, slap, kick or shoot them in the head. That defeats the entire point of a comedy show. There would be nothing left of comedy if comedians couldn't tell certain jokes for fear of a violent reaction from the public. And if one really crosses the line then there is always time afterwards to put them back in line without endangering the entire profession.

This is a social contract about comedy and comedians, and it is observed globally, if I am not mistaken.

What's disturbing about this incident is the fact the individual who did this is himself a stage performer, an actual comedian who had come to get an award for a performance in which he could possibly have crossed the line for somebody somewhere. This attack was made by someone who should have known better.

I think Will Smith has trashed his entire film making career right at its pinnacle. I for one will find it very hard watching films in which he stars after this, and I think that it's going to be the same for many more people around the globe and if this whole thing was staged then the Kabal shot itself in the foot.

I doubt Will Smith will be able to pull the crowds to movies he stars in, as easily as he has managed to do thus far, after exposing himself as a shallow, emotional and violent, insecure man.

Yes he should care about his wife. Yes he should protect her from being offended and having her feelings hurt. But the question should be asked what, in that GI Jane joke, was offensive in a way that's insensitive to victims of alopecia? This is if Chris even knew this is what she was suffering from.

And no! This is not me being distracted from what's important. This is me voicing concern for an incident I find unpalatable on many levels, almost all unconnected to Oscars and Hollywood, a feeling that I share with many other people around the world.

Ritual Human Sacrifice is the Driver of All of the Western World's Major Global Activities

One way to get your head around the fact every major undertaking by the western kabalistic elites is driven by ritual human sacrifice and torture, a practice inherited from their ancestry, is to study the "Etymology of Holocaust". keep in mind that while the word itself originates in the ancient Greek language, its etymological roots highlight a significant aspect of ancient sacrificial practices in Jewish worship.

I have put the words in quotes and ignored grammar so that you can copy and paste them into a search engine that way, as this will start you off on the initial research much more easily. Don't rely on AI as much while doing your research. It will tell you lies combined with lots of truth.

Provided you ignore attempts to associate the term to what actually happened in Germany during WWII, but instead focus on those results that go into the fact offering burnt human and animal sacrifices was cultural practice among Jews, you will get to the truth.

By "major undertaking" I mean such events as cause bloodshed on a major or minor but significant scale, such as major wars, political assassinations, massacres, major covert experiments in which hundreds or more are lobotomized or incapacitated and/or tortured till death, false flag operations that claim many lives such as 9/11, and so on. .

What remains unknown to the world population is the fact the holocaust was an act of ritual human sacrifice on a global scale, and it didn't just involve the jews. This truth is easily arrived at once you research the origin of this word and the fact it wasn't a German term. 

Keep in mind the fact the jews weren't burnt and offered as a sacrifice to some German god. They were gassed or shot, and many of them were experimented on. 

And it wasn't only jews who ended up in those gas chambers. Gypsies and even Germans themselves were also murdered. 

The only part where there was any burning of human bodies was during the disposal of the dead bodies. The affair wasn't religious at all, though the dedication to it was. What you then have to ask is why was a term that didn't have any relation to what was going on chosen to describe the elimination of jews from Germany? More to the point, why was a word that's exclusive to a single culture used to describe the mass murder of millions of people who belong to that culture in Europe? 

The thing to understand about the Kabal is the fact that they leave hints and clues to what they are doing in the open. They hide the evidence right out there where everybody can see it. They picked the term. "holocaust" to point out that what they were actually doing is conducting mass ritual human sacrifices of both jews and gentiles on a global scale, giving burnt offerings to an ancestral God worshiped by the western elites. What this event has been called in history, specifically the name "Second World War", is a cover for what is hidden right out in the open, which is that a ritual was being performed by the Powers-That-Be, a ritual they would later actually supposedly coin a culturally specific term for that described the event accurately. 

The Germans, who are seen historically as the main perpetrators, would hardly have used the term holocaust to describe what they did to the jews, in hindsight. "Eidlossung" would have been a more appropriate term for them to use, and they did use it for this during the war, but the people in control today who wrote this history, as victors do, do not want to refer to this event by that word? 

What's wrong with calling it what it really was, i.e. genocide?

Now, for the kabalistic western elites, ritual was, and is always the driver of the main undertaking, which in the case of the holocaust was the major world war. This is to say for them, if a major undertaking cannot be useful as ritual human sacrifice, then it cannot be done. They use ritual human sacrifice to guide their decisions. 

Theories about the cause of the major world wars, for instance, stress that the same people started all of them for the purpose of making huge profits off arms sales to both sides in the war. But then the profits from the sale of weapons can but be secondary and are largely superfluous for Bankers capable of creating money out of thin air. They don't need to sell anything to create wealth for themselves in a capitalist system they control. They just need to stand back and let commerce happen. The money will come to them and if too little comes their way, they simply make more of it, or they bend the rules so that it does. 

They may occasionally need to create more havens to launder the money they create doing their daily business, and the increased manufacture and sale of weaponry during wars does this very well.

In more ways than one, the profits from arms sales would serve as a measure of how the sacrifice they made to their god has been received.

The fact of the matter is the holocaust followed major bloodshedding events spanning centuries, and led on to a series of bloodshedding rituals that last till this very day, because the same people are still at it.

The transfer of jews to Palestine led to Palestinians taking over the mantel from the jews and becoming the central human sacrifices, and BTW this should in fact have been Ugandans had the initial plans gone through.

We are dealing here with the global assault on everybody on the planet by a cult that's lasted the better part of 2 millenia, and it's happening currently with vaccines that are intended to kill or maim, after the covid19 so called pandemic (that has failed to live up to that definition after 2 years), and we should really expect more ritual human sacrifice to come as long as the Kabal remains in control of our communities via their puppets in positions of power, as long as their system/culture prevails. They still staunchly believe that the god they pray to only blesses them once they have thrown victims to him after all and, apparently, they believe that the more people they sacrifice, the better their prospects become.

Decoding and Exposing The 666 In Kabalah

The Kabalah with Daath included.  

The Torah is the encoded Kabalah as the Rabbi's state and show. The Torah symbolically forms their world tree, and in the exact middle of the Torah the letter Vav is placed at the navel of the body of "god". In the Torah the number of the Temple of the Sun (Solomon or Sol-Amun) is 666.

The Sefirot of Tifereth is the sun and is given the number 6 and its placed at the solar chakra in the middle of the tree where everything connects. In Kabalah Tifereth is stated out of the short face which is the seven Elohim or "gods" that are the seven chakra's that Tifereth is the most important and the leader or king of them all. In Kabala the entire soul unites at Tifereth. This is due to the fact still noted in Hinduism all the male and female nadis unite at the navel. And the navel governs everything like a King governs a Kingdom.

The 666 is the number of the sun square and each square is given a sum number. 666 is the sum of all the numbers in the sun square. The seven planet squares relate to the seven Elohim or "gods" of the lower face in Kabalah. Hence this is the square of Tifereth and thus the six letter Vav is placed here.

The Vav in Kabala unites things. By placing the Vav here they are uniting the soul by activating this point the soul comes together in. That is why Tifereth is also called Daath in Kabala. Daath relates to melanin which is also referred to as the force behind life itself. Daath also means sexual union. It's the alchemical sexual union of the soul if you understand that alchemy relates to melanin as its study. Daath also relates to spirit and the solar chakra is responsible for converting spiritual energy into vital force for the being. The Vav is the letter of the serpent in Kabalah and relates to the belly of the serpent. The belly is the navel point and the serpent is the symbol of the sun here. Tifereth is the energy center that rules all the other ones as all the chakra's connect to the solar. Note: One in Kabalah means 13. Some diagrams show the map of the 13 chakras all connecting at Tifereth as well.

The formal Kabalah. Note that it is without without the "Daath". 

 

In free Masonry Hiram Abiff is the corner stone. Hiram is also spelled Haram which means "The Ram" the Ra or Ram is the ancient name of the sun God, the solar Chakra, and is also a mantra for the solar chakra. Abiff relates to serpent father. The Temple of the Sun in Masonry is the 666 as well. Its all relating to the solar chakra. The corner stone is an ancient title for this chakra its also called the Omphalos. The Beast 666 is a title of the Omphalos to the ancients. The Omphalos had the Phoenix which is what this word beast relates to in the ancient Greek.

Note the V letter was the original sixth letter in the Greek alphabet the Digamma. This was removed by the Church later and replaced with other letters and hidden away. The ancient Greeks placed a pentagram inside the serpent circle with 666 under it to show the Magnum Opus. The Pentagram in this fashion relates to the solar chakra which is the "sun or son" of the serpent goddess Venus being born into the world. This is the reborn soul and how it relates to the transformed solar chakra and life force or melanin. In the east, transforming the solar chakra is the major key to the Magnum Opus. This is openly talked on a lot in Taoism and mentioned in Hinduism in the Tantra's.

The Digamma in some ancient symbols are shown as four Digamma's coming together forming the Swastika the symbol of the solar chakra. The Digamma swastika shows the V letter connects the "four directions" which in Kabalah all unite at the navel chakra. The upper chakras the lower chakras and the left and right sides of the body and their nadis.

The fact is the Kabal simply stole the ancient teachings of the Gentile Pagan religion (kemetian science) and then corrupted them and hid them away in the encoded Torah. The Torah on the encoded level is a false history which forms a geopolitical doctrine and blueprint for the creation of a Jewish world government. The encoded Kabalah is simply the occult level of how the Kabal are using stolen spiritual knowledge against so called Gentiles (goyim to them) to achieve this.

Much of the actual Kabalah is taken from the ancient Egyptians and Babylonians before them. 666 is the sacred number to the ancient Egyptians, Hindu's, Babylonians and Pagan Peoples in general. Which is why like with 13 the Kabal want to scare Gentiles away from 666 because its an important number they want all to themselves.

Note 666 is also Satan or lucifer, and the Kabal know this. However it's because Satan is the symbol of the Gentile soul, and the 666 is the heart of the soul as even the Kabala admits. In Hebrew "Ra" the solar point means "evil". Because spiritually empowering Gentiles is evil to the kabal.

That there is the whole core of the Bible they push on us Goyim. Anything to do with spiritual knowledge and spiritual empowerment is evil in the hands of Goyim. 

Just send your energy into a kabalistic thought form of Rabbi Yeshua and bow to the kabalistic political ideology of their Zionist World Government ... which happens to be how the kabalistic Bible ends. With the 12 tribes of Israel [the 144,000] ruling the world under the "INRI", ie the King of the Jews.

We are dealing here with the same book which tells us Goyim the symbol of Gentile spiritual enlightenment (Satan/lucifer) is evil as well, meaning melanin is evil.

The Bible is full of the kabal's "god" attacking Gentile humanity in order to prevent them from spiritually empowering themselves. It is a literally device to act as the warning of the Rabbis. This is why under the Noahide Laws that the Kabal want to impose on the Gentiles, the first law is Goyim are not allowed to practice spiritual empowerment, the punishment for which is death.

Just like the Bible orders. 

Remember, Noah killed around 3000 people for worshiping a symbol of gentile empowerment in the form of a golden calf (Het Heru) when he returned from the mountain top, and he called it idol worship for which the punishment is death.

Cowards And Cowardice Disguised as Prudent Strategy are What Africans Have To Be Wary Of

Artistic depiction of the Battle of the Little Bighorn, also known as Custer’s Last Stand, the most ferocious battle of the Sioux Wars. Colonel George Custer and his men never stood a fighting chance.

I recall a time in my childhood when I would have conversations with peers about the native Americans we had been overexposed to through Hollywood movies, in which we would all come to the conclusion their extermination was largely due to the fact they fought till the very end.

Our view was that they fought on, even when it was clear they stood no chance of victory, even when defeat stared them in the eye. This view was prompted by the depiction of native Americans in the movies and series popularly known as westerns.

We would however thank the fact we (Africans) stopped fighting and surrendered for the fact we are still alive to tell the tale.

You must understand here that what I am talking about are infants doing the math. When we had these conversations, my friends and I were very young. The oldest participants in these conversations were no older than 10 years old.

We had already gathered information on the fact the native Americans were exterminated but it was too little to allow us to know the actual circumstances that prevailed at the time, whether indeed it was a fact that they fought till the very end, even in light of a full defeat, that was the cause of their extermination and the relagation to reservations of the few survivors.

Neither did we know enough about our own history to make the conclusion that our ancestors surrendered when they knew it was no use fighting, which saved them from extermination.

The view that putting up a white flag was responsible for our survival is actually widely held in Africa not just among insufficiently informed infants, but especially among the higher social rung adults. Even today in 2022, it is widely held as the proper policy towards the west, for instance. People who don't abide by this policy are either considered to be fools who don't get it, or ostracized. Some adherents of this policy will even overtly affirm that the attitude equates to "wise cowardice", and back it up with sayings about cowardice that are supposed to support the policy, such as "cowards survive". This is supposed to be wisdom in these parts.

But it's very easy to blow holes through the rationale.

For starters, wisdom in a group is fickle and there are as such times when what appears to be wisdom is in fact the reverse. This is because wisdom is genetic and can be bred out of a group during wars of conquest the likes of which Africa experienced. It's simple geneology. Get rid of the best one by one and over time there will no longer be enough born. The natives will start to become dumber and dumber on average, ending up with their most intelligent leader being a regular fool compared to what was once the norm, before the breeding-out or culling started. This is how a group is prepared for subjugation and kept oppressed easier and longer.

Also, intelligence has nothing to do with sayings in a language. Sayings can be intelligent but the fact sayings promoting cowardice exist doesn't mean it is a safe policy to adopt in light of an invasion. It also doesn't mean that adherence to such sayings preserves sanity or the intellect of a collective. When strictly adhered to, sayings don't improve on the inherent general intelligence of a people because there is no link between sayings and genes.

If the best have been depleted from a collective then sayings are not going to bring back the brilliance of the group, because then they are liable to be applied inappropriately.

Most crucially, it goes without saying that the logic of a coward is that of a fool. Under the circumstances that may prevail in an all out war, a coward's logic, as opposed to a brave man's logic, can often be the logic of self annihilation. And It's very easy to demonstrate this by showing just why the best generals in war are brave people as opposed to cowards.

Western imperialists out to grab territory don't leave people alive simply because they are cowards who won't fight them back. Europeans wouldn't have left native Americans alone if they hadn't fought back. The Kabal in Australia wouldn't have had a change of heart if the aboriginals hadn't fought off their incursion.

The fate of Australian aboriginals differs from that of Africans in many respects precisely because the former put up little to no resistance to a colonizing force. They fared far much worse than Africans precisely because they didn't fight or didn't know how to.

In fact, if the natives anywhere European explorers and conquerors went didn't resist the Impeding land encroachment, it would have made the task of eliminating their populations easier because that was the ultimate objective of the Kabal driving the process.

German colonial forces in Togo

It was not for nothing that when the Germans invaded Togo, they sang in jubilation that the Africans didn't have guns, because they were not delusional. African resistance was a major hindrance to the objective of having a country devoid of blacks at little cost to the invader. The Germans were experiencing losses that were putting them off the idea of taking the land they had set out to colonize but there was some comfort to be had in the fact ultimate victory could still be theirs, thanks only to the fact the other side couldn't put up as much resistance.

If you look at the wiping out of native Americans today, you realize one thing: they never stood a chance. The odds were so piled against them they wouldn't have made it except with external intervention. Therefore, if any native population survived the western Kabal's global rampage, then it's something else that saved them from annihilation, and it definitely isn't cowardice or simple surrender. Simply put, it couldn't have been because they stopped fighting.

Basically, the fighting back bought all native populations threatened with European colonization time. This is very true of central, southern and western Africa where the warriors that stood as a wall between the invaders and the interior can be thanked for the fact Africans found the space and time needed to do that which was required to survive Europeans.

The anopheles mosquitoe and the high breeding rates of Africans did the rest. But these two could only have been effective if Africans didn't ran off in a cowardly panic when there was nowhere left to run and the invaders would come after them, in hot pursuit, and quickly finish them off.

As Africans with knowledge of our history, we need to get these facts strait in order to survive, because we are still at war! A coward doesn't just destroy his/her own people, they also live to fight another day themselves because the war doesn't stop once they have ran away. Africans didn't stop fighting, and thank goodness for that because we wouldn't be here if we had all chickened out.

The war is still ongoing and cowards have caused us unnecessary loss in this war. We wouldn't be where we are at this stage in the struggle had they not been so numerous in our midst selling us out at every turn but, all else notwithstanding, our chances of surviving this never have been better thanks to our men and women who took and continue to take the fight to the Kabal in any way possible.

Native Americans weren't this lucky. Not only were they betrayed by the cowards in their midst for 12 dollars a piece, they were also up against a better armed enemy they realized was set on their complete annihilation, meaning they just had to fight till the end, if they could.

We have done better in this war compared to them, so let's keep it up by not letting our cowards lead us down the path to defeat. We should always keep in mind the fact cowards don't survive in the ultimate sense. No nation has ever been built by cowards. Cowards are liable to betray your trust. Cowards will sell anybody out. Cowards are basically losers and a liability. It's folly to allow a coward to lead you in battle. Cowards are the weak link in our struggle to free ourselves from western capitalist oppression. We will never win the war for control of our destiny with these cowards around.

On The Clear Signs Predicting the Impeding Fall from "Hegemonic Grace" of the US

Read more articles by Caitlin here.

After a short foreword, I will paste the rest of the short article by Caitlin Johnstone that's an appendage to her tweet above. Because in her I see someone else that sees the Russian invasion of Ukraine in more or less the same light that I do, and is unapologetic about their opinion, just as I am, I cannot resist the urge to add my take on the issue she raises.

I really got tired of all the "conspiracy theories" I had to deal with in my inbox from people who at base really have a vested interest in the retention of the status quo. What led up to the Russia/Ukraine situation are western shenanigans not just in Ukraine, but in countries bordering Russia,  that have lasted about two decades. 

It's because of these nefarious activities that Russia feels unsafe,  and was compelled to take action.  

It cannot be plainer why Russia just had to act, which was in fact predicted by many experts, yet people will ignore all this evidence and present some vague, unsubstantiated claim that Putin is working in league with the Kabal agenda for a One world Government, which really isn't in line with any major action taken by Russia on his watch.

There is really nothing more I can say about such messages than that they are all disinformation by those who have been deceived by western propaganda, otherwise they are in on it. They are working with or for western intelligence agencies, and I can understand why the disinformation is necessary and so rampant online. As Caitlin says, in some of her other articles, NATO's propaganda machine is humongous and highly underrated ... Many people out there don't know whether they are coming or going because of it.

The thing to understand is the western kabal is in a crisis right now that they have never been in before, one that they envisaged or predicted decades ago and have spent the better part of this period attempting to derail. The west is applying last ditch attempts to save their enterprise albeit in a manner that could lead to a world war in which there are no winners. This is a clear indicator of the extent of their desperation after all else has failed.

You see, it's over for western hegemony. The writing on the wall is as clear as day. China and Russia won't change course because they realize that to do so would be suicidal.

This is especially true of the number one threat to western hegemony, which is China. Huff and puff as much as NATO wants the Chinese are not going to slow their economic activity down for anybody now. They can't, and they cannot be made to.

The west has engaged the world in a game of chess and as is always the case in chess, pieces matter, and the biggest strategic pieces that are left to the west in this game are the pawns in the form of third world populations and resources.  Indeed, the west still has colonies in the third world, and they are crucial in this game, but unfortunately they cannot be a game changer because the west has lost total control of them. Threaten them, starve them into compliance, put puppet leaders in charge, murder threats, cause freak weather and earthquakes to frighten the cowards in control, the attractiveness of Chinese trade won't ebb within these countries ... no matter what the western puppets get up to to change this trend or at least significantly divert the preference towards western products and services.

It's that hopeless.

YouTube video by Democracy Now titled 'Russia & China, Together at Last”: Historian Al McCoy Predicts Ukraine War to Birth New World Order.

As historian AL McCoy predicts in his latest article “Russia & China, Together at Last”, the Ukraine war will inevitably give birth to a New World Order, but not the dystopian one the west plans on creating.

This one will be based on the Eurasian landmass and led by China and Russia.

Alfred McCoy, who is also professor of history at the University of Wisconsin Madison, writes that While talking to the Chinese president Xi Jinping via video call Friday, President Biden reportedly warned the Chinese President that China would face “consequences” if it provided material support to Russia amid the war in Ukraine. The call was part of U.S. efforts to minimize an emerging Sino-Russian alliance, which threatens U.S. influence over the Eurasian landmass.

He adds that, as U.S. global power declines, China and Russia “are going to emerge as the new centers of global power on the planet".

Anyway, I won't talk too much about this, for now, so that I can leave your mind unsaturated, in order that you savor Caitlin's short, succinct article on this issue, that I paste below.

__________________

By Caitlin Johnstone

The US and all its imperial member states are strangling Russia's economy in response to a war they provoked because Putin threatens US unipolar planetary domination and there are still right wingers whispering "I bet there's a hidden conspiracy to create a one world government.

This is all being driven by one particular power structure's self-appointed role as global ruler. The US-centralized empire's foreign policy behavior is essentially a nonstop war on disobedience, continuously working to absorb nations into its blob and destroy those who refuse.

Yes there's an agenda to unite the world under a single power structure, but it's the one leftist anti-imperialists have long warned about. And it's evidenced in public information like the Wolfowitz Doctrine and by just watching the movements of military equipment and resources.

Our world's problems are systemic. Pretending our problems are due to specific individuals like Klaus Schwab is tempting for people who are ideologically invested in existing systems like capitalism and US supremacy, because then you just need to get rid of those few bad apples.

Really though we're looking at the way our power-serving systems inevitably allow power to consolidate and reinforce itself and gradually work toward bending all humanity to its will. This will continue happening until we change those systems, ideally before we nuke ourselves.

...