Sunday 17 January 2021

Why Freemasons Tend to be at the Forefront of Emancipation Battles




Many people wonder what being a Mason does to one's message with good intentions for humankind, for instance what the predictions in George Orwell's books should be interpreted as in light of the fact he was a Mason. Was this masonic or cabal "predictive programming"? Was he merely doing their dirty work for them? 

Some people surmise that masons are in fact always doing the bidding of the cabal. It is assumed that the mere fact they are masons makes it so. Is there substance to these claims?

Yes and no. Sometimes, but not always, and in the case of Orwell this is clearly a case of a man who was just highly gifted and used this to predict future events based on the signs of the times. Orwell would have had to be exposed to a lot of highly sensitive information to achieve this, of course, and it would be inconceivable that the masons would allow him to share it freely for any purpose whatsoever.
 
It is not always black and white, or simple, but here is what I think about this issue that will hopefully offer insight into what is actually causing the phenomenon of masons tending to overrepresent people issuing forth messages or predictions that actually raise awareness with the potential to free people from tyranny.

In the context of the dominant culture, masonry is inseparable from the system, and it is true that most of the people who have exposed deep secrets about masonry, or attempted to raise the awareness of the general public regarding masonic or systemic agendas, happen to have been masons. I suspect that this trend will continue well into the foreseeable future, and there is good reason for this.

There is in fact no coincidence to this. It starts off with the fact the fraternity has no conscience but relies for the carrying out of its agendas on beings with one. The conscience of some masons gets the better of them, eventually, and they become whistle-blowers.

Once we have this established, we have to understand that the fraternity has a recruitment modus operandi that hunts down and recruits the best in any given community. There is a simple reason why they do this: for the most part, and to the extent that this is possible, the fraternity picks out individuals who are exceptional intellectually because they are destined, one way or the other, for leadership roles. It is after all by taking control of a community's leaders that the cabal takes control of the destiny of these communities, as Jean Mamy makes very clear in his film "Occult Forces".

The masons are versed in the detection of the best. They have been doing this for centuries in order to control world events. They know when they are dealing with true talent or a facsimile of it. They have had the time to position their hunters in areas of social interaction where the best are bound to be found, and they have perfected the skills of approaching them, befriending them, talking them into joining the secret society, influencing the decisions they make when they wield power, and so on.

Hence today, Greek letter fraternities and sororities are permanently camped out at higher institutions of learning, for example, where the masons know that the best are destined to end up in the formative stages of their personalities. Other than these locations, they can also be found recruiting members in government departments, boards of companies, parliaments, etc.

In picking their members very carefully, in thoroughly sifting through society, the cabal recruit the best people before they themselves even understand they are not ordinary, and will pass them through masonic oaths before they really understand what masonry is about.

Now, here is the snag. Most mentally gifted people tend to be good at joining the dots, or doing the math. In short, they are good at figuring things out. They are as such destined to be the first to figure out systems and agendas, by merely thinking their way to truths about them. These people would already have been lured into joining the secret society and will often be masons before they even know it, and if they develop a conscience later on in life, chances they will disobey masonic oath that prevents them from exposing masonic secrets by putting out information that harms the fraternity in some way, are increased.

And with this is increased the possibility that those who step in as activists for the truth, the so called awakeners of the sleeping masses, the raisers of awareness, the prognosticators of future events, will also be masons.

Let's understand that the it's not just the secret society itself that will expose members who gain the trust of the inner circle to information that is generally well hidden from the average Jim and Jack, either directly or indirectly. People can gain rare insights into truths about the culture they live in from other sources too.

The list of masons we have to thank for what we know about the agenda of the kaballistic secret society is endless, and in most instances the revelations they made led to their slaying. We can be sure in these instances that they were genuine whistle-blowers, but need not be restricted to this measure alone. 

I will list some of these masons down below, with a brief description of the role they played in the struggle to raise awareness in attempts to free humankind from slavery to the cabal, if not warn us of where we are headed if we don't awaken to the truth about masonry.

Jean Mamy: Produced the film Occult Forces which exposed the role the Freemasons played in the major world wars, and how they gained control of the positions required to guide the wars. Jean was executed after the last major war ended.

George Orwell: Played the role of awakener and prognosticator of the future of humankind based apparently on his inherent capacity to join the dots or correctly read the signs of the times, based probably on knowledge or insights he gained from inside the fraternity. He did this through his writing, notably in books such as Animal Farm and 1984.

George Carpenter: Awakener. Produced the film "They Live". This attempt to awaken the masses to the reality a group that is self identified by bloodline, or something to that effect, holds them in bondage, could have been based on what he had learnt in the secret society.

George G. M.James: Awakener. Authored the book Stolen Legacy that attempts to awaken the general masses to the fact Greek philosophy is stolen ancient Egyptian philosophy. He was subjected to the masonic slaying shortly after the book had been published. If you do not know what a masonic slaying is, then it is a murder where the neck is slit from ear to ear and the tongue is ripped out and thrust down the throat.

Marcus Garvey: Used his intelligence, and knowledge that didn't necessarily have an origin in masonry, in attempts to raise the level of understanding of his people, and offer solutions out of capitalist exploitation.

...

Thursday 14 January 2021

A Clear Case of The Road to Hell Being Paved With Good Intentions



The best those of us who are repulsed and disillusioned at what has become of the internet can do is wish Tim Berners-Lee good luck with his venture. It sounds on the surface like a good, workable solution to the issue of user data privacy.

However, I cannot help but wonder whether those whose livelihoods depend on the internet staying the way it is, not to mention those with strategic interests in this status quo, will allow this to happen. And here I am talking about non other than the corporations in the west that have made and continue to reap billions off the internet. I am talking about intelligence agencies that are benefiting off of the capacity of the internet to enable mass surveillance of civilians on a scale and scope unknown and unheard of before.

The west is currently the main beneficiary of the current manner user data is handled on the internet. This means that it will be the entire western establishment that loses out if Tim's idea is allowed to take shape.

This situation is comparable to the motivation for western resistance to advancements that threaten to end this same modus operandi, such as 5G led by the Chinese. 5G and Huawei have met with unified western (NATO) sanctions for fear of losing the benefits of the internet being run the fixed way that it is run, with western companies in control.

It's because of the increasing capacity of the Chinese to lead in strategic inventions that the west has for some time now been waging perpetual and covert bioterrorist attacks on China designed to hamper the capacity of the country to muscle in on their economic territory.

Let's face facts here ... Leaders of the west wouldn't allow a single individual to win if they are prepared to destroy the most productive and creative country to grace humankind since the Pharaohs, a phenomenon sensible people would readily embrace and emulate, rather than destroy.

We are experiencing a repeat of something familiar in human history and it is not for nothing that this is happening.

It's the way of the culture called capitalism, actually, that people are given no choices in a situation where they should have aptions. For example, a tenth (1/10) or 10% of Germany's huge economy depends on its auto industry. If you devise a new mode of transportation that doesn't require a car to have the technology current vehicles utilize to perform as well (that would be beneficial to Germans too) you will be frustrated in your efforts to make your product sell or outright eliminated by the Germans themselves because the loss of their industry would mean starvation for them.

So, rather than have their plate moved and starve because they cannot shift in their seat, they will be forced to do the simpler thing of eliminating a threat before it is too late, to forego the possibility of their own demise, even if this is at the expense of an actual advancement for the species. The Germans are not going to wonder whether they are better off having choices, whether this is more beneficial to them. It is cultural for the Germans to behave this way. This is how things have always been done in their culture.

This example focusing on the German automobile industry may give the impression that I am biased against Germans, while in fact I am not. I am trying to outline a situation here, and just happened to have this example of the German automobile industry handy. I could just as easily have used an example of British Petroleum to make the same point.

The fact of the matter remains that recent history is in fact replete with examples of inventions that were better than what existed but were frustrated in their efforts to go mainstream because of the threat they posed to the survival of existent ones. It cannot be disputed therefore that the technological advancement at which humankind currently finds itself is inferior to what the species would have attained if this system didn't exist.

The problem is the system. And It's not individual aspects of the system going or gone awry, such as the internet falling into the wrong hands, that need changing because they are but effects of a cause. The system is the main cause of all that goes wrong and needs changing, otherwise we will remain stuck in this twilight zone situation forever, a situation where better technologies, including ways of dealing with socio-economic situations that may arise, stand no chance of being established by those benefiting off of existent ways and technologies.

The internet data security Tim envisions can get up and become a reality, but what's to stop it from being hijacked by those whose businesses are threatened by the idea in the long run.

And we will quickly be back to square one, if we had moved away from the first square in the first place.

Haven't we seen enough examples of this to know better? The new social networking site Parler, for example, was considered a haven of free speech until push came to shove and it was unceremoniously taken down. This bizarre episode transpired a week ago after mobs broke into the seat of government, the Washington DC Capitol in the United States of America. Only then did it became apparent that the system already had the platform owned.

Parler wasn't given a chance to correct an error. It wasn't called to appear before congress to explain how they had let a wrong situation continue. They weren't given the chance to shape up or shape out, like Facebook and other tech giants were. Parler was simply banished from the internet, and democracy died in the dark.

What, should we surmise, is the difference between Parler and Facebook? Well, Parler is competition, while Facebook isn't. The western powers that be have vested interests in Facebook maintaining a monopoly on social networking media. They are benefiting from this and don't want this arrangement disturbed. It was therefore their chance to eliminate Parler when opportunity gave. Parler''s deletion from the internet had absolutely nothing to do with Trump supporters using the platform to coordinate their activities, if you read between the lines like I did above.

What needs to happen to correct matters and prevent the situation we are in from perpetuating isn't reform, which is what Tim wants to happen with the permission of big tech. We are well past the stage when reform can sort issues out and usher in the age when we can grow and advance virtually unhindered. What we need is a revolution, or at least the corrupt, incorrigible corporations that have established themselves in the dominant culture have to be tackled where it will cause their inevitable ruin, which can only happen by the rise of a new, superior competitor that isn't in the least affiliated to the old guard.

This is why I support the rise of China. This is actually the reason the west is fighting against their rise. China is in this sense our only hope where revolution and revolutionary movements are found too wanting in Western countries themselves where knowledge of the imperative to ditch the system is abundant.

________________________________

Click on the link below for the article on Tim's "pods" idea