A people benefiting from your disadvantaged situation, who are set on ultimately wiping you out cannot consider giving you reparations for what they are still doing to you. Jews couldn't have asked the Germans for reparations while still in the concentration camps

Your well-being is mutually exclusive from that of your oppressor's, especially one that started out enriching themselves at your expense, on your slave labor, and eventually got addicted to that arrangement. You will not be helped by the same party out of a status they put you into. That would be like an oppressor that's become stinking rich from your exploitation, and is still benefiting off of your oppression, helping you break the chains that bind you to perpetual servitude to their western capitalist culture and its plans for you that ultimately include your genocide.

Let's look at some concrete examples of this situation.

France has the world's fourth-largest gold reserve, estimated at 2,436 tons, and valued at $111.8 b. There is not a single goldmine in France. While Mali has no gold reserves despite having 860 gold mines producing 50 tons per year.

The French military is in Mali, and it is no secret what this occupation force is there to ensure happens.

France is getting all the gold from Mali and its other colonies in Africa, on top of the money it gets due to the "Pact For the Continuation of Colonialism" it forced all its former colonies to enter into, which amounts to 500 billion per year.

France obviously has no desire for this to end and would undoubtedly have an intricate structure in place to ensure that its good fortune continues, and eliminations of Africans, as indeed the contamination of their bodies and minds to prevent them from having what it takes to change this situation, is an integral part of it.

Comparisons to this structure would be Henry Kissinger's 1974 NSSM 2000 program that was designed to ensure that natural resources kept flowing from Africa. Kissinger was all too prepared to commit genocide if only he could keep the population of the continent to levels that would not impinge on the need for America to keep the resources from Africa flowing abundantly.

We can go on to other western countries involved with different nations on the African continent and the situation will be the same, albeit with different natural resources and differently named pacts.

The west is clearly still exploiting Africa, and benefiting immensely from this arrangement. It would seem senseless with this in mind that Europe would consider reparation demands from Africans for the harm it has caused the people of this continent over the period that it has been there given it is still doing the very things that harm the Well-being of the people of this continent.

The Japanese got their reparations because it was deemed essential to 'repair' them from the short and long term effects of what had been done to them, so too did the Jews. And, as things stand today, the Jews get 3 billion in tax monies from America alone every year, and more from Germany.

We live in the era of reparations, and it isn't the dawn of the age, by far. The Japanese got their first reparation in America as far back as 1909, right when blacks were still being lynched and dispossessed by their own government under Jim crow. Of course, there was an interest in maintaining this system of things so there couldn't have been talk of reparations for blacks, which isn't very different from the situation African Americans find themselves in today.

Four decades later, the Japanese got their second reparations. The Japanese American Evacuation Claims Act of July 2, 1948, provided compensation to Japanese American citizens removed from the West Coast during World War II (WWII) for losses of real and personal property. Approximately 26,550 claims totaling $142,000 were filed. The program was administered by the Justice Department, which set a $100,000,000 limit on the total claims. Over $36,974,240 was awarded.

And if you check the record of reparations, you find that, down the line, each reparation was handed out very promptly, with little to no delay.

But talk about delayed reparations for African Americans today and millions of whites from the entire west instinctively start obfuscating. The rationales bend and twist and you will not be faulted for thinking there is a "World Illogical Argument Contest" in town. Millions of westerners will pull up the Romans, Attila the Hun, the Vikings and etc., as having invaded and enslaved them ... but they aren't asking them for reparations because they are different from blacks.

We are supposed to believe that their enslavers are still around benefiting from their crime against them, as the descendants of the victims suffer the consequences, and it's all traceable right down to the Roman or Viking bank right next door.

I actually even came across an "Irish man" who wondered why Ireland hadn't asked for reparations from England for the devastation they caused the Irish via enslavement and war, absolute disadvantaging as to rival that of African Americans, diaspora Africans such as Haiti, or continental Africans.

Of course, the racist implication is that Irish (white) ingenuity is solely responsible for the advanced state Ireland is in today, while blacks have denied themselves opportunity for equal rates of advancement because of dumbness.

And I wondered at hearing this whether the Irish would survive what Africans have been put through. My estimate is that they would go extinct with only a tiny, minute fraction of the experience.

At this rate westerners might as well pull out the Lochness monster and accuse it of having disadvantaged them ... and it's still enjoying the benefits of the oppression as it rolls and wallows gleefully In the Lochness sea, unchallenged by requests for reparations by the disadvantaged descendants of its initial victims.

Africans, wherever you are, understand this ... When your tears have become another's joy, it's time to move on ... and you will have to fight your way out.

African Americans are in need of repair, but it's not going to come from the white supremacist power structure that still finds it necessary to keep them in bondage. African Americans are going to have to generate the repair themselves, and keep in mind there will be interference to this effort. The supremacists don't want them repaired because then they know they won't remain in the sorrowful state that makes for their joy.

Just remember black Wallstreet or the Tulsa massacres, and many other outrages.

Remember also that Belfast didn't experience a massacre by the English when it advanced too quickly.

Africans on the continent, we know that there are many wealthy entities in the west that were built off the forced labor of our ancestors. Many in the west are still benefiting off of this and growing from strength to strength. Entire countries are enjoying the fruits of actions that are responsible for the state we are in today, a state that is deliberately being enforced. We are also in need of repair but should learn from our diaspora brothers and look to ourselves for this.

We should do it ourselves.

Our repair is imperative, a priority, and should be self generated. It can only be initiated with a rejection of all that is western. We should first of all ditch the languages, the religions, and the system of governance that are the key factors making us fools of the west. It's because of these relics from colonialism that we suffer from a serious and debilitating Stockholm syndrome.

And we should also watch out for interference of this process from the white supremacy power structure still enjoying the fruits of our disadvantaged positions and doing all it possibly can to maintain the status quo.

We are at war, brothers and sisters, and we need to start living like we are. Our very survival depends on this in the end.

Facebook Manipulation of the User Experience

Image showing my inbox viewed in messenger (left) and the opera browser (right). The names are blacked out to protect identities. I left "PushBlack" clear because it is a commercial publication and good to use for clarity. Notice how it is at the top of the inbox in the browser, whereas it is third in messenger. It gets worse the lower down you go. These screenshots were made in succession, within a minute of each other as can be seen from the time and other details on the phone

Are you a frequent user of the messenger app? Do you belong to multiple, busy chats, some of which you have been included into without your permission but you didn't leave? Here is something you can do to see something very strange about Facebook chats on messenger.

Open messenger. Notice the new messages in your inbox? Don't open any of them but make 3 screenshots scrolling down so that you capture as many as possible.

Now open any browser, apart from Chrome. Ensure that it is an up to date version. Go to Facebook dot com. Click on the messenger icon to view your mail.

Cross check with the screenshots you made of your messages viewed in messenger to see if they are all displayed. If you are an avid user of Facebook who belongs to multiple chats then chances are that some of the groups and friends you see in messenger will be missing in the browser.

The messages that you see in messenger but don't see in the browser are generated by an algorithm that can be read by Facebook apps. Browsers don't see those messages.

To me, these chats and profiles are spoofs or spam, similar to the disappearing "Facebook User" profile only to the extent that these are made by external scammers, while the phenomenon mentioned before appears to be an inside job. It seems especially in the case of profiles that these are attempts to conceal identities from outside queries on them. It's like the profile exists on Facebook but cannot be seen by search bots that do not have the algorithm that allows them to read them.

Here is something else that is strange about some friends' profiles on Facebook that I have found the same explanation for.

Open Facebook in a browser. Navigate to your friend list. Open them one by one and check the url each time you have one open. Alternately, search for a profile of interest and check its url.

Normal Facebook urls contain part of your username in them, and these will be the names you used for registration. But I have observed that there are profiles that consist of just numbers. They sometimes look like this:

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1000300330etc., etc.

And other times they look like this:

https://www.facebook.com/1000300330etc., etc.

Normal Facebook profile urls read like this:

https://www.facebook.com/FirstName.LastName

I have tried searching the names of the people who own profiles that are displayed as digits in Google or duckduckgo and found that they don't show. I think that these profiles are generated by the Facebook algorithm in the same way groups are, because groups also consist of numbers, and maybe this is why they can only be read within the Facebook environment.

If this is the case then this is special privilege, and also an inside job. I do not remember being asked to create an account that is hidden from the view of search engines.

Lemme show you one last thing that is strange about Facebook.

Open messenger and go to chats you have had with friends. Select the lengthy ones and then take chunks of them that you then read through.

Open the browser and do the same that you did in messenger with the same message. Be careful to start reading from the same point where you did previously. When you are done, if you have my luck then you may find that the browser displays more messages than messenger, and if you have a good memory then you can pinpoint the exact location where the omission(s) occur.

It is typical for messenger not to display some messages, at least in my case but I doubt that this only happens to me.

Take note that the best time to catch the omissions is a short while after the deletion has occurred. I am talking from a few days to a week. I have noticed that in messenger the messages tend to "re-emerge" after this period has elapsed.

All of this suggests that we aren't just having our data sold on the open market by Facebook, but we are also being manipulated and forced into virtual spaces with strangers who are using their own identities but would rather their Facebook accounts not be found on the internet.

Imagine the potential harm that such an arrangement can have on your life? Imagine dating someone you fall in love with for years and discovering that the relationship failed because some crucial messages didn't show on both ends, leading to the creation of the wrong impression.

Imagine a spat that escalates with disastrous consequences when a message intended to explain a previous message is omitted.

Imagine that the character whose identity is being concealed that has wormed their way into your life is a serial killer or pedofile hiding from people who can recognize them by name is being protected from exposure by Facebook.

Organised Religion May Have Taken Exceptionally Deep Root in Sub-Saharan Africa Because of a Genetic Propensity for Prayer

The Abeokuta Diocese of The African Church, Ogun Province, Ogun State, Nigeria

I have always maintained that organised religion has taken exceptionally deep root in Sub-saharan Africa compared to any other continent (or among non-black people), because Africans developed a genetic affinity for prayer by the constant application of it in the daily lives of specifically ancient African ancestors.

Let me explain what I mean here.

There was a time in the evolution of the black "race" when prayer took on such an importance that it became a central feature of life in the community. The practice of praying was carried out so frequently and persistently, over a period that was prolonged enough for the need for prayer to indirectly affect the genes. This means that the beings themselves started seeing prayer as an essential part of life so that they felt naked without it. They developed a need for being deeply religious with a root in their very physical beings that they could as such pass on to successive generations.

What I have outlined above may seem to go against the priciples of Behaviour genetics, also called psychogenetics, the study of the influence of an organism's genetic composition on its behaviour that asserts that there is in fact an interaction of heredity and environment that affects behaviour without this implying behaviour itself is inherited. The behaviour is a by product of the combination of genetic inheritance and environment, which is exactly what I am also saying.

Here is my simple rationale behind something that's not natural becoming a genetic propensity the way being deeply religious is an easy state to trigger in a Sub-saharan African.

If you placed children in the wild some place that's isolated from normal human society, without introducing them to the culture of clothing or dressing up, i.e. you allowed them to run around butt naked, and allowed them to breed and create their own communities and ensure they remain isolated from yours, there is no doubt that the progeny will run around butt naked like their progenitors because dressing up isn't genetic. But then because they come from a history of people who dressed up for millennia, the need to cover their bodies will be dormant in them. I am not implying that they will have genes that want them to dress up, but given clothes do have a real effect on the body that can cause real biological changes in the long term that are adaptational in nature, such as the loss of body hair over time, including changes that are subdermal, the need to dress up can be evoked by these biological factors with a genetic base provided that there is a trigger. In the case of the children who grow up without clothes, it would just take exposure to a culture that dresses up for the group that stopped dressing up to take the practice up again, with a zeal that's only determined by how long and to what extent their ancestors took the dressing culture. If their ancestors only hid their private parts like some hunter gatherers do then they will not be as enthusiastic for clothes because the biological adaptations to clothing will not be far-reaching. But if their ancestors dressed to kill, then the whole experience of taking to the culture of dressing will be much more intense because there will be a biological catalyst for it.

According to a professor of psychology and academic program director at the National University in the USA, Brenda Shook, using singing as an example, someone could be an excellent singer, but is that talent genetic or was it learned? “It’s both,” she says. Maybe this person doesn’t necessarily have a good singing voice, but her brain is wired to be able to learn and remember. So her genetics might have made voice lessons more effective.

We do know that ethicities do come with special talents so it can be said here that what she is really describing are propensities that exist due to historical genetic exposure. It wouldn't otherwise make sense that a group of people display a preponderance of a specific talent if it isn't dependent on genetic factors that are inherited from groups of people in whom the stored genetic changes were a byproduct of exposure to a specific reality.

The fact ancestors of modern day Africans were extremely prayerful cannot be disputed. It is documented and some of the prayers have in fact been preserved in writing from as long ago as 5000 years. The Ancient Egyptians are a good example of an advanced African group who were very prayerful, and some of their prayers survive and are in use to this day.

I will share below one such prayer but, before doing so I would advise you to first understand the general meaning of the word "prayer". It shouldn't only apply to organised religion. In fact even atheists pray and use the word, sometimes as often as the devout. I know this because I am what you can consider an atheist but I use the term regularly and also accept that others use it. Christians pray and have a right to their prayers and so too do Muslims. The fact I am not either one of these doesn't make the activity less of a prayer compared to mine.

Prayer is merely a private or communal communication with what's perceived as a higher, usually supernatural being ... be this a spirit, a demon believed to have powers, a river God, in fact any supernatural entity one ascribes supernatural powers to, including an idol or one that's considered to dwell within the body, that one believes can hear and react to their prayer.

This is a Prayer to Osiris found in the Book of the Dead, originally known by the kemetians (Ancient Egyptians) as The Book of Coming Forth by Day.

------------

"Wash away my sins, Lord of Truth; destroy my transgressions, wickedness and iniquity, O God of Truth. May this god be at peace with me. Destroy the things that are obstacles between us. Give me peace, and remove all dissatisfaction from thy heart in respect of me."

------------

If the prayer sounds familiar then it is because the template upon which it is based is the same that the catholic church uses in its prayers. In fact this very prayer is also used by Catholics. This prayer is thousands of years old. It was used at a time when the kemetians recited the 42 Laws of Maat 5 times a day. That's a whole lot of praying and recitation of sacred texts for that period of history, don't you agree? And they had already been doing this for thousands of years? Bear in mind that this civilization lasted for millennia and the same culture was maintained almost continuously. Is it a surprise that the legitimate descendants of these people who still continue some cultural practices from old would be prone to become highly devout once reintroduced to prayer?

It isn't to me ...

Noah's Ark: Another Implausible Biblical Narrative by Writers Who Didn't Yet Know Where the Sun Went at Night

It should by now go without saying that the Biblical narrative of Noah's Ark may in fact be the clearest pointer to the mendacious mentality of the people who wrote the Bible, aside from the known fact that all of the writers didn't actually know where the sun went at night.

The story just fails to add up when put under scrutiny.

Of the many ways that the story has been tested for authenticity, the one in which it clearly fails to make the test applies specifically to the number of animals that can fit into a vessel the size of the ark in question. You see, it just isn't possible to load as many animals as there are species of them, multiplied by two, into an ark the size Noah built, and still leave room for the rest that the animals require to survive on for a whole year, such as food. Simply stated, the ark was too small to accommodate 2 of all the animal species that existed on earth at the time, period. 

 

And this can be demonstrated. 

According to National Geographic's atlas, and Wikipedia, researchers have been able to document around 1.2 - 1.5 million animal species in existence. However, the total number of species that are in existence is estimated to be somewhere from 7 to 8.7 million.

The Bible insists on a creation myth in which creatures great and small have a single creation period. If we make the a-priori assumption that God hasn't surreptitiously been engaging in the creation of new species now and then, we can assume that the documented number of species today is the same as it was in Noah's time, minus extinctions. In fact, knowing that species do go extinct, we can confidently say there were more species of animal at the time Noah lived than there are now.

To see whether all these animals fit into the ark that Noah built, we have to know it's exact dimensions. The Bible actually provides the measurements of the ark and, fortunately, thanks to decades of archaeological digs, scholars have been able to determine the approximate size of most of the measurements given in the Bible, such as cubits, according to contemporary standards.

For example, in Genesis 6:14-15, God tells Noah to build the ark 300 cubits long, 30 cubits high and 50 cubits wide. By comparing various ancient artifacts, a cubit has been found to be equal to about 18 inches, according to National Geographic's atlas. So let's do the math:

- 300 X 18 = 5,400 inches, which amounts to 450 feet or a little more than 137 meters in length

- 30 X 18 = 540 inches, or 37.5 feet or just under 11.5 meters in height

- 50 X 18 = 900 inches, or 75 feet or slightly less than 23 meters

So, by converting biblical measurements, we end up with an ark that's 540 feet long (137 meters), 37.5 feet high (11.5 meters) and 75 feet wide (23 meters).

Noah placed within his ark 2 of each species on earth, apparently with the help of God given the task is beyond what a human can do if we consider the modes of transportation those days and the regions of the earth accessible to a man with Noah's means ... and if we multiply the estimate of the total number of species above by 2, we find that he would have had to load his ark with a minimum of 16 million creatures to save them all.

If we overlook the impossible procedure of collecting so many animals in one place from every region on this globe, or attracting them to hike up to the so called "middle east", which entails going to the four corners of the globe to spread the message, but focus instead on the space available in the ark, we quickly find that 16 million animals couldn't possibly have fit into a space that's a mere 123 by 23 by 11.5 meters with room left over for food and other necessities, even if it had different floors to it. That's too much flesh and bone to fit into this space even if it was just insects that got saved.

Let's take out our calculators to show why this is so.

At an average of a centimeter each (a rough estimate of the total length of the average insect), 16 million insects would stretch for a good 160 kilometers. It takes some elementary mathematics to see that the volume of so many insects wouldn't fit into an ark the dimensions of Noah's.

One way of doing this elementary math would be to calculate the total volume of the insects and see if this fits into the volume of the ark.

Volume is easiest to calculate by multiplying length, width and height, and if the average sized insect was roughly 1 cm long, 0.5 cm wide and high (which is much smaller than the average size of a fully grown cockroach), the total would have a volume of 40000 meters squared, which is just above the volume of the ark itself at 32533.5 meters squared.

These calculations are done using only estimated insect average sizes. Remember here that we are excluding larger animals that would push the average volume of flesh and bone much higher.

This conclusion doesn't change if the number of creatures saved is reduced to the documented species only, which would mean Noah would have had to load 2.4 million animals into the ark as opposed to 16 million. The mathematics of it says it also doesn't work. They wouldn't fit in there and leave space for their food as well.

Also, given the food chain that exists today is the same that existed at the time, Noah would have had to take care that some pairs he brought on board were not consumed into extinction on the ark, which would have meant keeping them in isolation from predators while using some of their kind to prevent the animals that feed on them from going extinct themselves from starvation.

It would take a year before they got back on land to forage for themselves, remember? At which point all animal life would be long gone.

Which is well and fine for plant eaters aka herbivores, because plants survive a deluge. But this requires that animals that eat other animals to stay alive (aka carnivores) have a starter pack of feed that sustains them until their food source is replenished enough to survive their predatory instincts. It wouldn't make sense to save animals just to have them go extinct at the paws and canines of starving predators.

It's not a lot of stored food that's needed given there are only 2 boa constrictors, 2 mambas, 2 lions, 2 hyenas, 2 alligators, 2 crocodiles, 2 leopards, 2 cheetahs, 2 wolves, 2 dogs of each dog species, 2 mountain cats, 2 tigers, and so on and so forth. But that stored food is crucial to their survival given all the meat out there is rotten or locked up in pairs of two by two.

I suppose God provides them with a kind of manna from heaven as they waited for the first rat colonies to populate the earth.

Good thing fish didn't need to be saved because there are species of whale that grow larger than the ark. But even with land animals alone did you know there are easily around 5 species of elephant, and tens, if not hundreds of snake species?

Clearly, the people who wrote this particular biblical story with the intention of selling it for the history of the world had never been to the real wild, such as the Amazon forest in South America, or the Ituri forest in Africa, to document the species that live on earth, otherwise they would have written a different story, maybe changed the dimensions of the ship from a mere 100 meters to a kilometer, two, or even ten. In terms of animals, the writers were probably only acquainted with camels, dogs and cats, small snakes, chickens and ducks, goats and sheep, maybe gazelles and elephants, and the rest of the creapy crawlies that infested their middle eastern desert abodes, not the actual world and its actual real-life animal life beyond those confines.

We can be sure from their successes to date that their target audience was non the wiser, and remains the same today, but a new, more informed world has emerged to judge the truth in their texts, and place the Bible "for good" in the fiction category where it truly belongs.

All else considered, only the indoctrinated can believe stories in the Bible to be factual, and I guess this is what its deceitful, albeit shallow minded writers banked on.

African Neighborhood Watch Programs are a Vital Part of the African Western Elite Run Deep State

The cabal controls our communities using the churches and mosques. This is a well known fact. What's less known is the fact their most important means of control is through the freemason led Neighborhood Watch programs that were handed down to Africans after they won so called independence.

The programs were handed down to the leadership of select, usually secret society initiated Africans in their original format and are as such still, to this day, western controlled. They serve the same purpose that they did during the colonial era, which is to keep Africans under oppressive control.

Understand here that the cabal always control people using means the masses would least suspect to be how they are being controlled. People are usually controlled through trusted institutions they feel they have the most control over.

For example, people vote for leaders they think are wholesome. The party that they belong to is also seen in the same light. The last thought they would entertain is that their party or its leader is selling them out.

It's the same thing with the Neighborhood Watch which is made up of local men and women who would be the last that people would suspect to be working for an alien agenda, even if inadvertently, because it's also their neighborhood, after all. Who would knowingly work to make things worse for their own selves except idiots?

And most people working in the African Neighborhood Watch programs have no idea they are sometimes working to enforce neocolonialism.

What people don't know is that these Neighborhood Watch programs are a legacy of colonialism. This lack of knowledge is a product of the fact people will not take the time to research how their trusted program (Neighborhood Watch) lends itself to foreign control due to how it was handed down to Africans.

Find out the truth for yourself by researching the institutions that govern conduct in your community. Research the neighborhood Watch program from its inception. Better yet, investigate the operations of your local Neighborhood Watch.

If you have connections in your community and you know people who have worked with the local Neighborhood Watch, gain the trust of especially long term operatives to the point you can find out from them how many times they have been told someone was doing something wrong in the community and it turned out that the individual hadn't done anything that deserved the retributory/correctional actions that they received locally, that the only people/person they could have wronged could only exist in the western world? Ask them how many times the crimes some of the accused were supposedly committing in the community were fabricated or created from innocuous personality flaws that were blown out of all proportion or even deliberately created and rumored around in the community? Find out about the selection criteria for people put under surveillance and along the way you will discover that the selection isn't always made locally using local criteria. Find out the source of their Intel and along the way you will discover it is not always local but western.

If you can, then find out by investigation how many people they have maimed or even killed or assisted in killing due to orders that turned out to have nothing to do with what these victims did locally but abroad while living there or by engaging in matters that the west considers sacrosanct while living in Africa.

Our deep state is hidden right out in the open its just that we are not looking in the right places to uncover them and their activities. We are as such failing to see how our continent is being controlled, how our impoverished and backward status is being reinforced, how we are losing our best at the grassroots level.

Here is something happening in my own life that I am sure has everything to do with the western controlled African deep state. It is not the first time that this has happened and I am sure that, as long as I keep surviving these attacks, it will not be the last. I can know with certainty that whoever is doing this has no reason to do this to me save because they are being asked to do this by third parties. I am not politically active in this country and have in fact not lived here for the better part of my adult life. I have not made the kind of enemies that would want me killed. I do not own property with a worth that would cause someone to want my death in order to take over, nor am I squatting property whereby killing me is the only way of removing me from it.

Rest assured that I am not the only one going through such experiences here.

I am going through a period when I am having this sensation like I am being gassed in my own home. The hallmark of the feeling is a kind of ache of the teeth that I at first blamed for all the accompanying discomforts.

I initially thought it was just a toothache causing everything until I noticed that the toothache ebbed when I left home and was completely gone when the absence was prolonged.

About a week ago I spent 3 entire days working away from home and each time I was away, the toothache, and the discomforts it came with such as a burning sensation in the nose and back of the neck, stopped completely.

They however flared up "as soon as" I arrived back home.

Before the toothache starts, I get sneezes first, like an allergic reaction, then my nose gets runny and turns really sensitive to the point each time I breathe in it feels like the nostrils and the back of the neck are burning.

I experienced the worst of this yesterday at night. This morning it is only flaring up intermittently.

This doesn't feel like a disease because if it was then

1. It wouldn't be happening at my home only

2. The allergic reaction wouldn't be the preceding event

3. The nose and back of the neck burns wouldn't be a feature of my breathing in and out.

These are typical symptoms of exposure to a gas. I just need to find out which one which requires getting tested.

There was a time in the past when a company set up a blood test lab here, and I went there to get myself checked. They discovered that there were inordinate amounts of a fertilizer compound in my blood, including some traces of a pesticide, and mentioned that this wasn't unusual for people who live in the area. Most of them were eating vegetables from the local farms and this is where the poisons were coming from.

The problem is that at that specific point in time and prior to it, I had not been consuming vegetables from the local farms. I was growing my own vegetables that were free from fertilizers and pesticides. My entire food supply hadn't derived from local farms for months on end which made this diagnosis strange.

I am curious to know what a test will detect in my blood this time around. I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be carcinogenic. The need is such I wouldn't put this beyond the cabal. I wouldn't be the first they have done this to either.

The Kabbalah: Because a Mythology Forged By A Bunch Of Guys Who Didn't Know Where The Sun Went At Night Must Have All The Answers

It was all a forgery by a roving band of savage stone age culture vultures whose descendants are clearly not yet evolved enough to acknowledge the wrongful entry into civilized existence that their predecessors made, that it cannot work that way ... and acknowledge too the issues this has caused them, to eventually abandon the course their stone age ancestors set in stone for them. 

It will take time still 😂 

------------------------------

Who is Frank Einstein (Frenkenstein)? Wherefrom came this riddle? Did Mary Shelley really write the Frankenstein riddle? 

He settled me (Cavemen) in the valley of Kings/Death full of mummies (dryed bones) (Ez 37: 1).

These mummies (dryed bones) iconize the Judean dynasties (Frank Einstein) (Ez 37: 11).

There were Mummies (dryed bones) in the valley (Ez 37: 2).

Mummies (dryed bones) listen to the word of the Capo (Ez 37: 4).

I open your GRAVES and raise you (Frank-Einstein) from therefrom (Ez 37: 12).

They (Ape-like) stood on TWO feet, and built a great Military Industrial Complex (Ez 37: 10).

Come from the four winds of war, Boreas, Notus, Zephirus and Euro (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) (Ez 37: 9).