I will paste below a post I came across on social media that sums up the cause of the conviction.
-----------------------------------
She died at 56, her father was assassinated exactly 56 years ago at 39 years of age. She died on a day that is exactly 39 days before the end of the year, and exactly 39 weeks from the anniversary of her father's assassination. She was born on 09/30 or 30/09. Remove the zeros which have no value.
#MurderByNumbers
----------------------------------
Some of the coincidences listed above are just that: coincidences, while there are two facts that couldn't be coincidences. Lemme explain why I think so.
She was born the same year her father was assassinated therefore the age at which she dies would have always been the amount of time in years that had elapsed since his death, provided this happened after her birthday.
She was 1 year old on her first birthday which was a year after her dad was assassinated. Prior to her birthday she wasn't yet a year old. This is why she had to have had her birthday that year for this figure to reflect how much time had elapsed since her father was killed.
The next item that is hard to brush off as a coincidence is the fact her birthday contains the exact numbers of the age of her father at death. This is odd, but cannot be anything other than a coincidence too.
What's special about this oddity is it would have made her a prime target for those who use numbers in their murder games. And it seems more than likely that this is exactly what happened, as I will explain below.
In order to understand my explanation, we have to first acknowledge that her age and date of birth are always going to be numerically related to either the age at which her father died or the time that had elapsed since he died.
If she had died last year, her birthdate would still have contained the same numbers, and she would have been 55 (if she died after her birthday), which is exactly 55 years after the death of her father.
The tricky part is to get the days remaining in the year to equal his age at death, which would require deliberate fixing of the date at which she was going to die, while also making the number of weeks till the death anniversary of his death equal his age at death as well.
There is only one week in the year that this can be done, and within this week only one date that can be picked, which is the 22nd of November.
If, for instance, she died last year, or any other year prior to this, including her very first year in life, on the 22nd of the month November, then the weeks left till the date her father died, and the number of days left till the end of the year would have equalled his age at death. This means that this combination would always have worked, no matter what year, no matter what age she was.
But if she was killed a day earlier or a day later, then only the weeks before his death would have equalled his age at death and not the remaining days of the year. This applies to all the days in the week where the 22nd of November occurs.
22 is as such the special date, the unlucky date for her, if someone was checking her numbers and realized that she had a birthday that contains numbers that are also in his age at death. 22 is the date if someone was looking to create a number of coincidences that couldn't pass as such to just about anybody, in order to have something they can use to prove to the wary or critical minded that her death was not natural.
In order to grasp what I am getting at here, just ask "what the odds are" that she would die not just the same number of days before the end of the year as her father's age at death, but also the same number of weeks before the date he died as his age at death.
That's like lightning striking the same place twice.
I don't believe in this kind of coincidence and know that many people in the black community won't either. I am as such convinced that this date was deliberately selected for the purpose of making it clear that she had in fact been murdered.
I can see why it would be useful for some parties in the west to do this, especially the white supremacist segments of western society who, like the Klan they are, are constantly dying to send a message to militant black nationalists that gives the same message as the Klan burning crosses on the lawns of black folk was intended to give.
This is terrorism as an instrument of controlling a group, plain and simple. They want with this single act to have us know that they are watching us closely, and that the repercussions for "disobedience" or militancy are dire.
Family won't be spared.
It's not difficult to understand from whence this panic emanates. Malcolm X has been gaining in popularity of late to the point he may be the most quoted black leader of them all.
Malcolm X was fighting for freedom. His main strategy in this fight was telling the truth to awaken his people to their true status in the system and as such make them see their plight and hopefully initiate a process of self liberation. And if the white supremacists, who are the defacto leaders of the west, and are solely responsible for the death of Malikah, feel that Malcolm should be punished in the worst way possible for nobly and intelligently striving to be free, including by extending the punishment to his children, and his children's children, if this is considered in this system to be an appropriate and effective deterrent for those who would like to fight to be free, then western society still regards black people as its property.
Here is yet more proof of just why our pleas for things like reparations have fallen on deaf ears.
And I hate to say this, but it appears that how we are regarded in this culture, our real status within it is only a secret to us alone, not to the culture that holds us in bondage. Incidents such as this murder unfortunately only remind an insignificant few among us of this truth. The majority don't get it.
Let's understand, for once, that it's only when we are no longer held in bondage, when our oppression is over, when we are really free of what at base is a parasitic infestation, will murders such as these become obsolete. Only then will we be considered (in the minds of the supremacists) to be eligible for such things as reparations, and the rest that goes with this.
As I have said several times before, the jews couldn't have started asking for reparations while they still languished in the concentration camps.
No comments:
Post a Comment