Freemasonry Is No Friend Of Black People

"Fools will die for want of wisdom"

~ Peter Tosh

It is said that ignorance is no excuse, and being ignorant of who the freemasons really are is no excuse for blundering into the traps the secret society sets for control purposes.

The Freemasons are no friends of black people. They never were, nor ever will be. This is just how it is and it is indisputable. In fact, it is not something you need to find a book written by a trustworthy authority to believe to be true. You do not need to be a rocket scientist to see that it is true.

This fact has left an indelible mark on history itself, and it is preserved there for all to glean. .

It is well known that in any organization there is a hierarchical structure, and that nothing gets done without the say so of the upper echelons. This can be a group of people sometimes, and other times it can just be one person.

In the west, those upper echelons happen to be the masons. Here, we cannot possibly be talking the regular recruit who lives next door to you, but the masons in the inner circle of the secret society, the people who actually run the secret society itself, as opposed to those who are merely members.

I will list below facts that are known about masonry that are accessible to anybody who cares to find out, including people who wish to join the fraternity, and others who want to support or vote for a politician who is a freemason, in which case, unless you are Jewish and white, you are making possibly the worst mistake you will ever make in your entire life.

Fact 1 - masonry is a Jewish institution

Fact 2 - they founded America (the USA)

Fact 3 - given they were the founders of this country, they allowed slavery of Africans to start and continue because their say so was instrumental to the commencement of the slave trade in their country. We.can as such say they were behind the Transatlantic Slave Trade, not so much as footsoldiers of the Jesuit Order and Catholic Church who were also deeply involved, but in corroboration with them given America was their turf.

Fact 4 - they created the Slave Patrols

Fact 5 - they created the police from the patrols when they were disbanded ... and they still control the police services in the USA via the masonic police union called the Fraternal Order Of Police (FOP)

Fact 6 - they created the Ku Klux klan when the slave patrols became obsolete because they felt freed Africans still needed to be controlled by terror tactics that would be unbecoming of police officers to also exercise. This is the reason the Ku Klux Klan has survived so long without being outlawed and not answered for their crimes. The very rulers of the land created them to do their dirty work for them.

Fact 7 - They were behind the Berlin Conference of 1885 that saw Africa sliced up into republics that were handed to individual western European countries. Some of these new countries (if not most of them) were given to the leadership of masons and called by their names as well. Rhodesia is a good example. It was named after the freemason Cecil Rhodes. King Leopold was also a Mason who got the Congo handed to his tender mercies and commenced to carry out masonic dictates by murdering around 10 million Congolese. Administration of many of these colonies was carried out by masons from the get go, the former and Gordon Guggisberg of the gold coast being good examples.

Fact 8 - the CDC under the behest of the masons conducted the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. Black masons from The Boulé frat were used to coordinate the experiment.

And so on and so forth till date.

Knowing all this about the masons, why would any black man join them? Is it because being a Mason has been painted as the quickest way to wealth? What manner of foolishness is it to trade monetary wealth, that can be had many other ways, for the survivability of your own kind? Isn't it clear the masons don't want blacks to survive? If you don't care about your life then what's the point of having children while busy sealing their doom by joining as such helping an organization that's shown an intent to exterminate black people reach its objective?

Isn't it clear when we review masonic history, especially when we combine it with what the book that's behind the ethnicity behind masonry, that describes non jews as filth equal to dogs and as such not worthy of liberty or freedom, that the wealth they give is a trap?

The prudent thing that we black people can do for our own sake is reject masonry and everything that has something to do with it. Either this or we accept masonry in which case we have to accept that we are fools, and deserve to perish as fools.

Click here to read how the masons founded the Ku Klux Klan 

Here's Why The Powers-That-Be Couldn't Possibly Let Ramarni Wilfred Be

Watch the video here

When I first came across the story of Ramarni Wilfred in a group, I immediately commented that he would not be allowed to use his intelligence by the powers that be, especially not in a black community. In fact, he would not be allowed to live or stay sane if he was allowed to stay alive.

This is a conviction I hold regarding highly intelligent Africans living in this culture that isn't mere guess work. I have had first hand experience of this truth and it is in fact writ-large in history, and the present too, as I will explain below.

But first I will get one thing out of the way. Now, this is something I don't normally talk about, and I will only mention it here to make a point. You see, I also have a very high IQ.

Exceptionally high IQs are not things you see on the faces of people. You may sense that the individual is odd, maybe that they talk strange or behave differently. but these observations seldom make the cause clear. In my life experience, unless in academic circles, people seldom rate me highly on the intelligence scale. In fact most people think I am dumb, a fool, and they don't want to hear the foolish things I have to say.

But that's hardly the case. I can probably comprehend more complex matters than they could imagine.

Whether my IQ is higher than Einstein's is not something I can know because I have never taken an IQ test that goes above the score of 145. The total number of questions in all the tests I took was 145, and I scored an average of 138.

The IQ bell curve that helps categorize where people fall along the scale of intelligence, and does so in a neatly compartmentalized way.

If you look this up, you will discover that it is an exceptional score. In fact, only 2% of people in society belong to this mean and of these, only a fraction hit 138.

I do have my reservations regarding quantified intelligence but do know that IQ test results are quite reliable as indicators of how adjusted one is to the dominant culture. In my opinion, having a score as high as mine simply means I would find it easy to find my way in this culture, nothing more, nothing less.

The distribution of IQ scores differs among different races, with the Asians having more of the high scorers, seconded by the whites, with the blacks coming last. Now, this doesn't mean that us blacks do not have people who score very highly. In fact, just as my example, or that of Ramarni clearly demonstrates, we score just as highly as both Asians and whites ... just that we have less incidences of such scores.

I have sat in international classroom environments where students from Asia, Europe, Africa and Arabia sat for the same exams. The expectation was always that the Asians would come up tops, followed by the whites, but I surprised everybody by passing top of the class.

And this experience isn't unique to me.

And there is another known fact about our IQ scores that points at how it possibly came to be that we ended up having a paucity of highly intelligent people. Africans who have very high IQ scores seldom have family members who also score as highly. The other family members gravitate towards other means, whereas in white and Asian families, high IQ individuals tend to cluster within families.

What this means is that Ramarni, for example, wouldn't have a sibling who would also be a genius, no matter how many family members he had. He would remain the odd one out, whereas Einstein's chances of having a family member who is also a genius are higher.

This last fact suggests that the low incidence of highly intelligent people among Africans isn't natural. It means that intelligence was bred out of us and is only manifesting in recessive genes that aren't yet enough to go around, and the only way this could have happened is through extensive purges. The only time in the history of the race that this could have happened is during colonialism (for continental Africans), and slavery (for diaspora Africans).

What we know about slavery on the plantations in the diaspora is that, to keep on the safe side, Africans were closely monitored for intelligence. They were not allowed to learn to read or get educated because education makes a man difficult to put down. The nature of education or knowledge acquisition by reading is the process makes of any man a better individual than they would have become without it. But then people who are naturally intelligent do not need education to be awake. It comes naturally for them that their eyes are open by default. In a cultural context where the truth has to be kept hidden, these types cannot be allowed to live because they are revolt and rebellion risks.

In systematically eliminating intelligent Africans, the enslavers were making a choice between being secure in the knowledge they would see another day on the plantation or not.

The same thing applied in colonial Africa where settlers had the same interests to look out for as well. Holistic purges became a feature of the slavery and colonialism systems and it has also spilled over into the present as the need of the west to keep Africans completely controlled has not abated. This truth cannot be disputed and, in many ways, many Africans, including my own self, have been perfect examples that holistic culls are still a reality for us. What's worse is the fact today, unlike was the case then, the actual culling is now being done in part by our own misled people. This in itself is a measure of how low the average intelligence of the race has dropped as a result of the purges.

A gene has almost been bred out of us.

Any walk through the streets of Africa will show you clear examples of this. People in Africa just don't see the glaring examples of their failure to cope in this culture that are all around them. Millions will walk right by a major fault and not a single individual would recognize it as one. Very little is run as it should be, and even if an effort was made to cope, there would be too few people to organize the process on a national or even continental scale.

The only people who could make a difference for Africans in their current mental condition are geniuses, because only they would come up with the short and long term solutions to the hurdles Africans face in this quest to cope in this capitalist system, and these individuals are exactly what the west, that still has vast interests in African resources, wouldn't want roaming around African neighborhoods unseen, where God forbid they could start their devising of strategies towards a viable, modernized Africa that's in control of its destiny, which also translates into the continent being in control of its total resources.

Now, this, the west cannot  tolerate, and preemptive measures to prevent such a scenario from actualizing have of necessity got to include making sure intelligent Africans don't materialize, and if they do then they shouldn't be allowed to get their way. 

A Technology From an Ancient Civilization Has Possibly Been the Key Enabler of Zionist World Conquest

Circumcision as a rite of passage is called a technology in its own right. This is because it is a clever, scientific and effective technique for deflecting the subconscious and natural loyalty of any human being from its default to a socially desirable one.

When prepubescent boys are passed through this rite, their loyalty to their family unit, that most of them would otherwise retain well into adulthood, is successfully deflected to the greater community to which they belong. This process works because it is applied to the center of an individual's personality that is rooted in their sexuality, which in turn is linked to their genitalia.

Prepubescent boys are thus manipulated by the application of pain in ritual to the center of their personality, which affects them enough on a subconscious level to sufficiently impact their conscious permanently, and if the entire rite of passage is performed properly and expertly, the exact mental orientation desired of the initiates can be attained with accuracy.

The prerequisite for this change to happen is that there be a conscious to manipulate in the first place, of course.

Where there is non, such as in the live, ritual circumcision of baby boys who are still operating from the subconscious, what is irrevocably changed in them, considering they don't yet have a conscious existence, is still in the subconscious. What is permanently deflected in them from the default to a socially desirable orientation lies in the subconscious, considering they are being grabbed by the seat of their personality before they have developed one.

Science has published results of studies that provide proof that the brains of baby boys who undergo this ritual circumcision are altered permanently, and it would seem that this is the intended outcome if you consider the advanced occult knowledge that the group that routinely does this to their children has at their disposal, that their ancestors appropriated from Kemet, from the very culture that invented the technology.

It should go without saying that baby boys who are a product of such ritual, whose brain structure is permanently altered, also develop personalities that are not in line with the norm, or abnormal, the exceptions to this rule being babies whose circumcision merely involved the removal of the foreskin under anesthesia, of course ... without deliberately causing them pain so intense they burst their eardrums crying, which is another known and scientifically documented side effect that has been observed of ritually circumcised baby boys.

I am firmly of the opinion that, given a critical number of members of the cabal that run the world observe this ritual for all their males, the reason the world was easily conquered and is currently run by psychopathic personalities that few can fully comprehend, whose actions fewer still can understand or deem sane, may have as simple an explanation as what the products of this procedure become. It takes a man missing a component that is essential to making up a wholesome human being to do the things we know the western cabal has been guilty of doing through the ages ... all those murders, exterminations, the genocides, all the miseries and tragedies they caused and are still deliberately causing the world over, without even batting an eyelid?

There is nothing normal or even human about all that.

But here's the thing: the cabal would seem extremely cruel, wicked, and evil to those of us who still have a normal brain, but they don't see it that way themselves. Their actions may even seem gratuitous, futile, vain, pointless to most people most of the time, but not to them ... not to humans who have had a procedure done on them that makes them so different from the rest of us as to be an alien species.

And such personalities are perfect for a culture that has world conquest written into its very religion. They know us, but we don't know nor can we anticipate them. Simply put, we can't see them coming.