The west is secretive about its true leadership, and uses a lot of disinformation to prevent people knowing how it is all arranged. It doesn't say who actually leads behind the scenes, and who among the many powerful entities that have been identified in the west as leaders, holds what rank within the hierarchy.
But it's all hidden out in the open, if you know where to look.
In trying to pinpoint who actually holds the reigns of power in the west, the first thing we need to acknowledge is that the west is highly organised, and also that the prerequisite for high organization is an organised structure with not three, four or two, but a single head at the top.
There can be no multiple heads leading, but just one, be this an individual in whom powers are vested, or a group of men and women acting as one, and this head has to have the last say on everything that matters to the corporate whole. In other words, nothing that happens in the west does so without the say so of the highest power, or elite, of this block.
Of all the entities in the west who are considered leaders, the Masons take the crown hands down, and there are a multitude of very simple reasons why this is so.
I will deal with some of the more salient ones here, and leave the rest for an in depth treatise on the matter.
Firstly, we know from statements by men who were better placed to know better, men who had walked the hallways of power, and brushed shoulders with the most powerful people on the planet, that leadership of the west is by a secret society, including a group of closely affiliated powerful bankers.
Here, I am talking about statements made by high ranking government officials in many countries across the globe, leaders of various organizations, etc., including former presidents of the USA, going back to the very first one, George Washington, and down through the line to yet more men who would later occupy the same office, till finally we come to the summation in a statement made by non other than John Fitzgerald Kennedy, in a speech he gave to the American Newspaper Publishers Association in the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York, On April 27th 1961.
In case you are one of those with a mindset that wants to wish truths away, the reference to secret societies in JFK's speech was NOT about communism.
Communism is a system, a mode of social provisioning, and in referring to it the last term an articulate man would use is "secret society". There is nothing secret society-ish about a system, and if the communists had created secret societies within America and the rest of the west with intent to infiltrate and subvert, then JFK would have referenced this directly as secret society infiltration as part of a communist party conspiracy, not by describing communism itself as a secret society.
He knew, like other high officials of, before and after his time, that the whole world is opposed by a monolithic conspiracy dating back to the time of Babylon. The “communism” talk is exactly the kind of nonsense enslaved mindsets, such as people working at Snopes, Metabunk, Rationalwiki, push to obfuscate the truth about where the true leadership of the west lies.
In fact, because we know that JFK wasn’t the only man in history who discovered the truth, and sought to expose the network of secret societies that truly control the world, there is no rational reason to attempt to ascribe what he said as a reference to communism.
This is the same tactic that was applied to the book "Animal Farm" by George Orwell, the rights of which are now owned by the CIA, that was declared to be a statement on communist oppression.
I will proceed to list quotes below of statements made by some of the notable men who expressed much the same sentiments that JFK did, so that there is not a single doubt about the fact JFK was talking about the masons.
"It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). That Individuals of them may… actually had a [sic] of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.”
George Washington. (First USA President)
"A power has risen up in the government greater than the people themselves, consisting of many and various powerful interests, combined in one mass, and held together by the cohesive power of the vast surplus in banks."
John C Cahoun (Vice President of the USA 1825-1832)
"Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day."
Theodore Roosevelt (26th President of the USA)
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
Woodrow Wilson (28th President of the USA)
"The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation… The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, … and control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection."
John F Hylan, New York City Mayor
"Today the path to total dictatorship in the U.S. can be laid by strictly legal means… We have a well-organized political-action group in this country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a one-party state… It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government… This ruthless power-seeking elite is a disease of our century… This group…is answerable neither to the President, the Congress, nor the court."
USA Senator William Jenner 1954
"The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to "secret societies", to "secret oaths" and to "secret proceedings" … Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing "around the globe" … no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent … For we are opposed "around the world" by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has "conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine" that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”
John F Kennedy (35th President of the USA)
(Quotations mine)
And perhaps the closest to JFK's statement:
"The Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”
USA Congressman Larry P McDonald, 1975
"There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.”
Hawaii USA Senator, Daniel K Inouye 1986
Surely, anyone who would venture to circulate the idea these men were talking about a Russian communist conspiracy has to be as deluded as the men who attempted to ascribe Orwell's books to descriptions of communist decay. It can only be a person who is part of the very secret society cabal being described in the statements that fights to put the spilled beans back in the pot, or a mental slave of the elites acting under their orders for handouts and favors, who would not have the intelligence not to insult the intelligence of people who comprehend these statements.
But then I stray.
From these statements it is deductible who the people who run the western world really are, but not easy to say who has the last say, unless you read between the lines, unless you do the math and join the dots.
When you understand that the principles of Jacobinism and the doctrines of the Illuminati are propagated by the masons, you have to conclude that these two are movements within the secret society, not influences from without, and that the bankers, who are also referred to as powerful entities in the west, also similarly fall under the tutelage of the masons. They are the same behemoth, the same monstrosity departmentallised.
And there is more to this.
The Masons have functions in Western society, and every other country where they are established, that are connected to the role that a head, or leader, plays in a society, that include the function of controlling the opposition by leading them.
It was Vladimir Lenin who once said "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves", but the idea of a controlled opposition was not his creation. The striving to control the opposition is constantly, actively and explicitly carried out by the masons, in full view of a public that only fails to realise what they see happen in front of their watchful eyes, in broad daylight, because they fail to join the dots.
One way to see this activity and identify it for what it is in today's world, one has to either listen to freemasonic whistle-blowers expose the society, or join the dots.
A French film called "Occult Forces - The Mysteries of Freemasonry unveiled", made in 1943, notable as the last film to be directed by ex-Freemason Paul Riche (the pseudonym of Jean Mamy), gives us a good example of this masonic modus operandi. You can watch the film below:
FYI, Jean Mamy was in fact a whistle-blower, who appears to have seen this MO from inside the fraternity and attempted to expose it by making a short film about it.
How do we confirm what Jean is relaying in this film, that he is not a disinformation and obfuscation agent apart from looking at the fact he was executed after the war, and the masons were implicated in his murder, given this can be disputed or made up?
Simple. By looking at an operation that the masons carry out blatantly today that is similar in intent and machinations to what Jean depicts in the film.
In today's world we know the Masons have set up shop at almost every high institution of learning on a global scale, often in the guise of Greek letter sororities and fraternities, where they lure society's best to become members. They would only be doing this "targeted isolation of talented minds" if they know the highest institutions of learning are where the best in society end up. The masons obviously understand that, to control society, they have to control the best in that society.
Higher institutions of learning furnish society with future leaders, and anybody who controls these people before they spread their wings, controls the society they belong to.
These higher institutions of learning also furnish the very masons with their future leaders given their best have to be the tip top best to cope, and they have to be properly educated. The masons themselves breed their own successors, to stay on the safe side, but as would be expected in a reality where nothing is always guaranteed in the inheritance of talent, and superior intellects always abound outside the bloodlines of the masons, meaning the most talented people are not always going to be their seed who automatically stand on their side, the Masons have to be looking elsewhere for talent to recruit, and potential opposition to control.
Knowledge of this reality leads us up to a connected one which is the main function the masons play in western society.
The chief role of the masons in the west, is to function as the think-tank of the whole western corporate entity. How do we know this? Partly by knowing that the aforementioned activity of seeking, isolating and recruiting the best within society connects to this.
How?
The freemasons are a powerful group in the west with access to the best brains in society by virtue of their recruiting activities. They cannot but use the very same best they meticulously collect at colleges and universities to think for society and, eventually, after they have been indoctrinated enough, after they have been deemed eligible to enter the higher ranks within the fraternity, they can think for the very secret society itself and become its leaders.
The public usually thinks when mention is made of the society as the hand behind major global events, then all masons are implicated, including the low rank Mason next door. It is understood from this that mere membership of this secret society means participation in their diabolical schemes, but nothing could be further from the truth than this.
It is true that all masons are passed through an oath room where they should swear to never reveal secrets about the order that they glean within, the punishment for which is slaying by having the neck sliced from ear to ear, the tongue ripped out and stuck down the throat. And these regular recruits are exposed to a lot of secrets that society is better off knowing about, but then to be able to be part of the think-tank, and be identified with what the masons do, they have to go through ranks.
The fraternity is stratified in structure. This entails that it's not every Mason who can take part in the decision making process. It's not every Mason who can sit at the round table and "directly" participate in think-tank debate. It's not every Mason exposed to every secret there is to know about the secret society.
Participation of recruits in the decision making process is indirect and often inadvertent. Issues tabled by the inner circle are deliberately and opportunely also discussed with lower ranked masons, without them knowing what they pertain to, and if the contribution they make is sound and novel, the leaders will use them.
Banker families, such as the Rothschilds, though powerful, are not so arranged as to be able to provide the leadership and direction an enterprise the likes of the west needs. They cannot as such have the last say. They are however an important part of the power structure. They can be considered the treasurers within the secret society that leads, as well as the accountants. They, like the illuminati, remain but a part of the masonic power structure. Leading members of the Rothschild or Rockefeller families are in fact freemasons, just as are members of all Royal families in the west.
The Rothschilds may have unimaginable power, they can control the finances of entire countries, and though this could lead people to conclude that they call the shots, they are but an arm of the masons. The powerful Rothschilds cannot conspire, cannot assassinate a president, cannot buy a country for Jews, without the permission or say so of the core of the masons.
This is how a highly organised entity works.
The idea the masons are foot soldiers of the Jesuits is basic disinformation. The Jesuits are not represented as leaders in Western society, if you look around you. They are not as announced as the masons are, just like the banker families who can only point at their mansions and other possessions as their trophies. Freemasonic symbolism and insignia is supreme in Western culture. The Rothschilds may run banks but the banks will usually have freemasonic symbols stamped all over their facades and in their edifices, with freemasonic date stamps on everything they handle, including the cash and cheques they issue.
Even the social organ central to a rule of law society, the judiciary, isn't free from masonic stamps and signatures on edifices, walls, garden decorations, and within, that honour the one and only power in the west. Most of its judges are masons or EasternStars, the female counterpart of a male mason. All of these individuals would have been recruited at higher institutions of learning where the freemasons have set intricate nets for the capture of their kind.
Some western cities have entire neighborhoods designed to resemble masonic symbols and insignia, especially such like London after the fires that destroyed it.
That, right there, points you at all that tells you who the man in the west is.
