The middle-east has gone up in flames, much to the relief of the
Isrealis, one may suspect. The deliberate protraction of a crisis that
began by using Kuwait, then weapons of mass destruction, bringing the
blessings of democracy to an oppressed folk, etc., as justifications for
a full fledged military invasion coupled with the necesity of regime
change , has finally brought the walls of Arabia down. One by one,
nation after another, territorial integrity, social order and identity
has gone to the dogs, whetther by direct invasion, revolution, or
heavily armed rebels.
The duration, convolution of the tale and extents the party
orchestrating the madness is prepared to go to realize their every wish
suggests strongly that, at this point in time, they want the confusion
and destruction to last as long as will be necessary to bring the region
into a state they desire. This state is in most likelihood a point of
no return ...when the region has been taken back to the stone age
proper, with no chance of it ever getting back to the level attained
before the madness began. The aggressors are definitely leaving no
stones unturned, meaning we may watch Arabia burn for a long time to
come, and might even take the scenario as the norm for the region.
The madness can only end when experts in the ranks of the invading party
are sure the middle-east cannot but remain weak and vulnerable, a state
in which the people here can be remotely controlled, forever.
Take one look at Libya, Iraq and Syria today and this truth will stare
you in the face. The aggressors went in with objectives jusified by lies
and have had to increase the number of lies once those objectives had
been met. Now, rather than find an excuse for being were they don't
belong, they are using proxies to kill two birds with one stone ... The
proxies are causing further destruction in the region on their behalf
and, when necesary, are being used as cause for heavy, surgical military
strikes or even the return of foreign forces to the region. But if, as
the evidence suggests, weapons of mass destuction, Saddam or Gadhafi,
human rights abuses ... were not the issue that prompted the invasion,
then what is the real reason behind the current desructive activities
that know no end? What does the west want to achieve in this region?
The answer to that question is also plainly spelt out in the events we
are witnessing unfold in the middle-east, and it is not a novel notion.
There is much veracity in the observation made by a few in the past that
the interests of those orchestrating the murderous, destructive
conflagrations in the middle east, which is definitely the western
world, are at odds with middle eastern developmental aspirations.
Western official speak reflecting a deep seated desire to see a
democratic middle-east is simply not sincere. The last thing those
touting this tale would want established in the region is true democracy
as this would work against their agenda for the region. Nor are the
security needs of Isreal the hidden factor behind it all as these are
clearly not a priority but an excuse to engage, They can be viewed in
the same light as all the other lies propagated for the purpose of
justifying invasion, for instance the demonization of select leaders in
the middle east (including their regimes) culminating in the promotion
of the idea regime change in these countries is what will bring security
not just to the region, but to the entire world. Follow the fictive
story-line ... this is a world maniplated into silence if not compliance
by repeated "terrorist" attacks on their territories or regions,
attacks that are loud and always too near for comfort, no matter how far
ground zero is from the country, attacks supposedly conducted by
fanatics waving a banner of middle-eastern origin, pointing out that
this is where it all goes wrong, the region that requires savaging for
the world to become secure again.
It is very easy and sometimes actually lucrative to go along with this
tune, but one is advised to think of how easily it can be turned against
one in our current world. The better thought that makes for a conscious
stance involves shoe switching, because it is in truth a "there but
for the grace of God go I" situation. There are many who are conscious
where the matter is concerned but then the number of those not checking
their stance is significant enough for the conclusion to be drawn that
the world is dancing to this tune, this storyline and its unfolding
chapters being written as we speak. The world has unwittingly become an
actor in this story, a believer by virtue of the fact the source of the
tale is a culture that has established its place as primary.
But while it is in theory true that Isreal (read "the world") is safer
if the middle east is constantly bombed into the past, better yet if it
is burnt to a cinder, it is paradoxically also true that western stocked
conflagrations in the region make Isreal (read Jews) less safe in that
it becomes a bigger object of hate each time around. Unless Jews can
convince not just their own selves but humanity that their lives are
worth more than Arab lives, the cost in human lives of keeping Jewish
humans secure in a geographical location they lay a dubious claim to is
untenable and will inevitably lead to the rise of a global conviction
Isreal's destruction is what will save lives and preserve sanity in the
region, as a result make the world more secure.
The small country is already an accident waiting to happen when some
factors about our world are taken into consideration, and the odds of
tragedy striking are increasing as more and more people suffer and die
in the name of its security, and I would personally not be surprised if I
woke up to a dejavu like scenario, 911-esque for instance, in which
that nation as opposed to two towers and their occupants, is in crisis
unforeseen. Not a wish of mine as I remain neutral but it must be a
mental image that recurs in many a conscious imagination in the same
manner worst case scenarios do. For instance, I do not discount the fact
many people are occasionaly haunted by thoughts of their own selves
trapped in a fuselage filled with other panicked humans who have
realised they face forces they could not possibly survive when they
crash into the earth they see closing in below after something has gone
catastrophically wrong with the plane they're on ...
Let us all keep in
mind here that it does actually occasionally get to this point despite
the fact stringent proffessional controls follow every piece that
becomes part of the final machine and that planes themselves once
assembled and in service are subject to routine checks conducted by
qualified engineers. All of this considered in terms of Isreal's
security would be the efforts of MOSSAD, "preemptive or normal", to keep
Isreal safe, done in cooperation with the CIA and other intelligence
agencies.
In addition, it is in the nature of the west and western long term
interests in any region that Isreal can easily become, by vice of its
size and the truth Isrealis are not special humans whose offers will
always be superior, expendable.
It is not even the black gold that is the curse of people in the middle
east. Oil is only partly an issue in that it has allowed for wealth that
has in turn made possible rapid advancement and revealed to the former
colonizers that mentalities in the region were not sufficiently worked
over during colonialism. People here were left with enough brains to see
a way to own and benefit from a resource in lands they own, in sharp
contrast to Sub-Saharan Africa that was clubbed so hard on the cranium
it is a complete basket case incapable of benefiting as much as Arabs
from any resource it owns. Oil has indeed hastened the time period the
middle east would have needed to rise from brain bashed formerly
colonized people to a group that gets their act together and starts
gaining ground in progress but it is not the problem.
The real problem is a system or culture that believes in hegemony, a
paranoid culture that has enjoyed the benefits of cultural imperialism
to the maximum ... got obese on it, genocidal, murderous, insane and
unsightly but remained desirable not just to every other tribe outside
its realm, but to a significant number within the culture itself,
because the culture retained the capacity to control how it is perceived
thanks to cultural primacy. The west cannot allow things to change at
this point in time because, once the culture is not primary, or central,
there will be nothing left to keep it from being stripped down to the
bare essentials. When all is bared, out in the open, people will run
away. The culture will become despised in fact with nothing left to
prevent it becoming obsolete.
Read Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" out of the box, i.e., not as a
recomended academic work of some repute, but as a blueprint for an
agenda. The factors he thinks will constrain the progress of
"globalisation" become enemy cultures when the term globalisation is
substituted with globalizm or "cultural primacy/imperialism or
hegemony", and you will understand the fact that central to Huntington's
thesis in this book is the fear outlined before ... fear of a culture
losing its central position.
The problem is indeed the permanent quest for cultural supremacy, a
quest that makes the culture's interests mutually exclusive with every
other tribal or national interest, even that of prospective ones, and
ultimately at odds with the very manner the universe operates. Its
properties as indeed the course of our own evolution tells us in many
ways that change is constant. Those who go to extreme lengths attempting
to prevent change ultimately find that time itself has become an enemy.
As things currently stand for the west, the tears of others are viewed
as their joy. Any sign the other is having it better than they are is
experienced as their tears ... a threat. Reacting on these cues,
destroying, then preventing other races or tribes from regaining the
capacity to advance, from getting their act together, becomes the
preoccupation of the culture. And when the concept of tribal survival is
fully grasped, then, of course, its opposite meaning becomes a cultural
preocupation. Breeding itself, a function of survival, becomes a threat
to one's tribe and has to be curtailed in others or, better yet,
stopped completely. The culture becomes obsessed with genocide and this
fact has been clear from recent history.
Furher Henry Kissinger and David Rockerfeller exemplified this cultural
mindset in their works and words. Henry Kissinger was the architect of
the HIV/AIDS pandemic in Africa, a program that was based on fear of the
change that inevitably results with time's passage. This program was
designed to prevent the risk population increase in an underpopulated,
constantly copulating third world, posed to America's (read the west)
access to the continent's resources. The third world in question had
been through genocides engendered by invadors seeking slaves, and land,
that had reduced their numbers significantly. They needed to increase
their numbers to previous pre-slavery, pre-colonial levels to cope in
the new, nation state era, and were already doing a good job of this.
They were set to survive by the mere act of breeding, but, somewhere in
the world, a parasitic, parochial, optionless entity saw this survival
potential by procreation as a threat.
Dangerous tunnel vision.
David Rockerfeller is known to have effectively remarked to a hall of
school children that ethnic minorities in America can only be useful as
sacrifices on the altar of white well-being. Without this sacrifice,
whites would be a doomed, pityful lot. The actual statement was of a
rose representing the white race and the buds that grow up around it
representing the sacrficial races.
The mistake should not be made of seeing this reality in racial terms.
Race itself is used as an instrument of cultural primacy. The truth of
the matter is that the culture cares not what race someone really is.
All it sees are threats. Its tentacles of control do not just reach out
to other tribes, but inside the same culture where many are subjected to
like or worse terror and sacrifice on the altar of cultural primacy's
survival. The culture created the race divide and knows that it will
collapse as soon as the culture loses its central position.
The quest to enforce cultural primacy at every turn is the true culprit
in all of this, the end-point, the final explanation. It is the reason
the afflicted culture or tribe, the leading culture of our era in this
case, goes to extreme lengths keeping the poor groping in the dark,
confused, at a disadvantage, bereft of essential enlightenment. Tactical
nukes, much confusion and perpetual internecine strife for Arabs.
Iatrogenic germs, and other infectious agents with a fresh Fort Detrick
sticker on their side, accompanied by a smokescreen disease that keeps
the natives looking in the wrong places for cause and solution, complete
with its overly toxic killer medications, etc., for Sub-Saharan Africa,
and a parrallel justice system that weeds out threats to the order
using covert warfare in the culture's bastion. The system of covert
elimination here is so refined one should not be surprised why, for
example, the efforts of many conscientious westerners following dictates
of their conscious when they take on cases of paedofilia in high
places, among those in authority, have borne little fruit.
The genocidal aspirations have the potential to succeed if the part of
the world they are targetted against does not wake up to this truth,
especially if it doesn't wake up to the means in employ to actualize the
devilish intentions.
For example, since the eighties, the number of spy satellites hovering
over third world skies has increased, and they are not there to help
farmers in Kenya in one way or another, as the mainstream media would
have us believe. Factually, they are doing their bit to bolster
surveillance and afford a more effective manner of affecting common,
innocuous pathogens. They are the eyes in the sky that monitor all and
manipulate events so that the western program and agenda prevails, and
this sometimes entails directed murders perpetrated by ground recruits
(locals in it for the money oblivious of the fact they are working for
their own demise) or directly from the satellite's onboard directed
energy weapon arsenal. Much research is also being conducted on
unwitting people on the ground, controlling the course of their lives,
often destroying them gratuitously as these powers refine their capacity
to destroy.
Make no mistake about the truth this is really happening, whether it
involves determining the national attitude towards ebola that is
enforced by getting rid of those who are influential and could affect
public opinion, or who gets to outlive their tenure.
It should come as no surprise that, today, many in Sub-Saharan Africa
express the belief good people, especially those doing good work for
their communities, don't live long. Question we need to ask to get the
whole picture is why anyone would entertain this idea when, clearly,
death can only be random? What is really happening is this that Africans
know something very wrong is going on in their communities. They have
observed a trend but lack the imagination to know how deeply into their
communities foreigners can and have decided to reach with technology,
the means they are using and the convictions driving them (how else can a
foreign power keep a group backward than by covert murders of their
best once they are noticed?). The state of mind that resorts to
mysticism or religion to explain an observed reality can only result
when the technology and organization used to affect what people perceive
is beyond the majority's imagination.
Much time, thought, effort and energy has gone into perfecting the
methods used to keep other cultures in the past, and, crucially,
remotely controllable. They have evolved to the point today it is
different strokes for different folks. This means they are tailor made
for cultural, religious, racial, regional or national realities ... each
target group getting just that which suits their thinking, that which
makes them make mistakes that play into the enemy's hand, that which
keeps the agenda veiled while wreaking havoc. The natives keep pointing
fingers of blame at each other, loathing each other. It should all be as
the Roman General Tacitus, living in a culture the current one
succeeded , wanted it to remain when he said: <"i>may the tribes
retain, if not love for us, then hatred for each other".
Suffice to conclude that the methods in employ to keep the third world
bakward and vulnerable are constantly getting updated to adapt to the
times as cultures react to changing circumstances. If, as a result of
increasing awareness, it becomes impossible to make the natives
undermine their own selves in politics of the belly frenzies, drones and
fighter jet bombardment, satellite murder and manipulations, then
occupation by foreign forces in countries where few would have thought
it possible or necessary will occur and become the norm.
In order to assure our survival in such a world, we need to recognize
the nature of the foe we face (cultural primacy), we need to acknowledge
a state of war and understand why it is not declared in order to stay
above the lies and, lastly, we require to make a response to all this
and, given we are so backward, this response has to be assymetrical. The
response should suffice to raise the consciousness of the grassroots
... We require to raise our guard to the point we are no longer as
oblivious of realities around us, as such develop the capacity to not
only monitor our surroundings, but devise workable means of detecting
and undoing damage caused by the many covert attacks we have been
subjected to to date.
We will need the help of our best to achieve all of this and the best
way of securing their guidance in this process is to learn to spot and
protect them before our enemy does. We will not survive unless our best
survive. This, trust me, is the surest way of stopping the cultural
imperialist in his tracks.
